Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

NCAA: 'It's not our job to ensure educational quality'

Posted on 4/2/15 at 3:33 pm
Posted by CockInYourEar
Charlotte
Member since Sep 2012
22458 posts
Posted on 4/2/15 at 3:33 pm
https://www.cnn.com/2015/04/01/sport/ncaa-response-to-lawsuit/index.html

quote:

(CNN)After years of making the case that the education of athletes is paramount, the NCAA now says it has no legal responsibility to make sure education is actually delivered.

https://www.ncaa.org/about/what-we-do/academics, "It's our commitment -- and our responsibility -- to give young people opportunities to learn, play and succeed." And later, it says that "in the collegiate model of sports, the young men and women competing on the field or court are students first, athletes second."

But the NCAA is taking a very different position in response to a lawsuit filed by former University of North Carolina athletes. The lawsuit claimed the students didn't get an education because they were caught up in the largest known academic fraud scandal in NCAA history.

In its response, the NCAA says it has no legal responsibility "to ensure the academic integrity of the courses offered to student-athletes at its member institutions."

Even with pages of online information about academic standards, and even though the NCAA has established a system of academic eligibility and accountability that it boasts of regularly, NCAA attorneys wrote in this court filing that "the NCAA did not assume a duty to ensure the quality of the education of student-athletes," and "the NCAA does not have 'direct, day-to-day, operational control' " over member institutions like UNC.

"It's nonsense. It's double talk," said Gerald Gurney, a former athletic-academic director who is now president of The Drake Group for academic integrity in collegiate sport.

"If you look at their basic core principles, it's all about academics, the experience, the integration of academics, and the education of the student is paramount," Gurney said. "They seem to talk out of both sides of their mouths."



Basically what I thought. The NCAA isn't going to do anything to UNC, they are going to say it's an issue for SACS Accreditation (Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.) However, SACS already said that they didn't know how to handle this based on the scope of the fraud (3,100 students in fake classes for 20 years.) However, there were 31 grad students who got a Masters in Education degree taking fake classes from HBC Barber Scotia College and SACS removed their accreditation...so I think they know what they are supposed to do...but they think UNC is just 'Too Big To Fail.'
This post was edited on 4/2/15 at 4:38 pm
Posted by BarberitosDawg
Lee County Florida across causeway
Member since Oct 2013
9914 posts
Posted on 4/2/15 at 3:58 pm to
Nobody cares here either...
Posted by CockInYourEar
Charlotte
Member since Sep 2012
22458 posts
Posted on 4/2/15 at 4:42 pm to
Nobody would expect you to even read that article, sidewalker.
Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
69895 posts
Posted on 4/2/15 at 4:59 pm to
Downvote for you dawg
Posted by Prof
Member since Jun 2013
42610 posts
Posted on 4/2/15 at 6:10 pm to
Then they need to drop the APR penalties and more.

TBH, this sounds like a flat out lie on their part as they not only have the APR standard but also grade and admissions standards. This lie is motivated by not wanting to nail UNC's balls to the wall. The penalty for UNC would be severe if the NCAA had the wherewithal to treat them like other schools and they just don't want to do that with a major cash cow (NCAA makes all their money on roundball).
Posted by Cockopotamus
Member since Jan 2013
15737 posts
Posted on 4/2/15 at 6:24 pm to
The REC is taking notes from their big bro UNC
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter