Started By
Message
re: Doesn't LSU owe A&M anyway?
Posted on 3/3/15 at 2:33 pm to GarmischTiger
Posted on 3/3/15 at 2:33 pm to GarmischTiger
quote:
GarmischTiger
Tis true. Kyle Field is officially the most overrated visiting stadium in all of sports.
1
Posted on 3/3/15 at 2:37 pm to bbap
quote:
so for the last 20 years every a&m fan i've met who has bitched about LSU owing them money has been completely wrong? That's pretty funny if true.
That's aggie for you.
Posted on 3/3/15 at 2:40 pm to Latarian
It is painfully obvious that LSU effortlessly bosses A&M around dictating payment terms like a true kingpin. The only way A&M is able to gain any footing is to file an embarrassingly petty lawsuit which is rather unbecoming of a SEC institution. LSU has messed with their heads so much, they filed the lawsuit in the wrong state!
Posted on 3/3/15 at 2:44 pm to Oizers
Don't forget about them being told by LSU what they can and cannot wear
Posted on 3/3/15 at 2:46 pm to Oizers
Don't forget about #31 Matthews being told by #7 Fournette to lie down on the ground.
Posted on 3/3/15 at 2:50 pm to NFLSU
quote:I would have lost a bet on that statement being true.
Tis true. Kyle Field is officially the most overrated visiting stadium in all of sports.
Damn.
Posted on 3/3/15 at 2:50 pm to EKG
The contract said $500,000. If we sued y'all, it was going to have to be in Louisiana. Se we took the $100,000 even though it was $400,000 less than what you owed us.
Posted on 3/3/15 at 2:52 pm to Hugh McElroy
quote:
The contract said $500,000. If we sued y'all, it was going to have to be in Louisiana. Se we took the $100,000 even though it was $400,000 less than what you owed us.
annnnd thats what you call settling
.. we still dont owe yall shite so stop trying to spin it. 
Posted on 3/3/15 at 2:52 pm to Latarian
No. And A&M didn't pursue it because they didn't have a case (and they were embarrassed they lost to ULL-the team LSU got to legally fulfill its contractual obligations).
Nice try, pig.
Nice try, pig.
Posted on 3/3/15 at 2:55 pm to Hugh McElroy
quote:
The contract said $500,000. If we sued y'all, it was going to have to be in Louisiana. Se we took the $100,000 even though it was $400,000 less than what you owed us.
Soooooo, what I'm hearing is Aggy was actually LSU's bitch. Awesome.
Posted on 3/3/15 at 2:56 pm to roguetiger15
That's true. We settled. You agreed to pay us $500,000 if you canceled, and you canceled with two years left, but you only paid $100,000.
Chavis agreed to pay $400,000 if he left early, and he (arguably) left like a week early. So he should pay like a hundred bucks.
Chavis agreed to pay $400,000 if he left early, and he (arguably) left like a week early. So he should pay like a hundred bucks.
This post was edited on 3/3/15 at 2:58 pm
Posted on 3/3/15 at 2:57 pm to Hugh McElroy
quote:
So he should pay like 80k.
Good luck.
Posted on 3/3/15 at 2:58 pm to wadewilson
quote:
Good luck.
Good point. I edited. My first suggestion wasn't equitable.
Posted on 3/3/15 at 2:59 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
Meh. I'm glad they pulled the most chicken shite move in the history of college football.
Didn't LSU drop their two out-of-conference rivalry games (A&M and Tulane) after the SEC expanded the schedule to include the newbies, Arky and Carolina? A&M actually got a better deal than Tulane, because LSU actually offered to play A&M one more time.
This post was edited on 3/3/15 at 3:09 pm
Posted on 3/3/15 at 2:59 pm to Hugh McElroy
quote:
That's true. We settled. You agreed to pay us $500,000 if you canceled, and you canceled with two years left, but you only paid $100,000.
I don't think you understand what the word "settled" means. Not to mention we tried to give you a rent-a-win with USL. Way to go on that one.
quote:
Chavis agreed to pay $400,000 if he left early, and he (arguably) left like a week. So he should pay like 80k.
Maybe he should've tried to negotiate a settlement.
Posted on 3/3/15 at 3:00 pm to MightyYat
quote:
Soooooo, what I'm hearing is Aggy was actually LSU's bitch. Awesome
well thats nothing new
the aggies have and always will be the little annoying wannabe younger brother to someone. like that one little kid always getting jacked in the face in tetherball at recess.
This post was edited on 3/3/15 at 3:01 pm
Posted on 3/3/15 at 3:02 pm to TIGERFANZZ
quote:
Now they NEED them to drop a lawsuit so they won't have to pay their new DC.
Actually its the other way. We need this lawsuit to get nasty so we have a rivalry for rivalry weekend that doesn't require us winning anything.
Posted on 3/3/15 at 3:03 pm to roguetiger15
quote:
like that one little kid always getting jacked in the face by Fournette's balls at recess.
FIFY
Posted on 3/3/15 at 3:10 pm to Hugh McElroy
quote:
That's true. We settled. You agreed to pay us $500,000 if you canceled, and you canceled with two years left, but you only paid $100,000.
Well that's the definition of settling. Which means LSU does NOT owe A&M anything.
I cant believe the entire A&M fanbase (i really dont think i'm even exaggerating that much) has tried to perpetrate the lie for this long that LSU owes them money.
Posted on 3/3/15 at 3:13 pm to Hugh McElroy
quote:
You agreed to pay us $500,000 if you canceled
That was to be only in the event that a suitable replacement was not found.
LSU believed USL to be a suitable replacement.
USL believed USL to be a suitable replacement.
The judge believed USL to be a suitable replacement.
aggies didn't not LSU believe USL to be a suitable replacement.
...I wonder why.
quote:
Chavis agreed to pay $400,000 if he left early, and he (arguably) left like a week early. So he should pay like a hundred bucks.
Wrong. A&M had Chavis sign a contract stating that A&M would pay buyout fees, therefore A&M owes LSU $400k.
Page 4 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News