Started By
Message
Non-LSU & Aggie Fans: Rate the Chavis hire if $1.7mil figure is true
Posted on 12/31/14 at 1:26 pm
Posted on 12/31/14 at 1:26 pm
Curious what the rest think
Posted on 12/31/14 at 1:28 pm to okietiger
If that is what it costs for aggy to have a top100 D.
Posted on 12/31/14 at 1:28 pm to okietiger
What's $500k with the new SEC network money?
The arms race continues.
If A&M can afford it, good for them. He's a proven quantity.
The arms race continues.
If A&M can afford it, good for them. He's a proven quantity.
Posted on 12/31/14 at 1:28 pm to DaleDenton
I can't tell if that was positive or not
This post was edited on 12/31/14 at 1:29 pm
Posted on 12/31/14 at 1:29 pm to okietiger
What's a couple hundred thousand more for us? Really
This post was edited on 12/31/14 at 1:30 pm
Posted on 12/31/14 at 1:29 pm to okietiger
Great hire. 1.7 is a drop in the bucket to SEC teams nowadays.
Posted on 12/31/14 at 1:30 pm to okietiger
Solid hire. It's just money. A&M is like Auburn......they just need a competent D to be very good. Chavis will build more than a competent D for them. It may not be in year one, but he will get them there.
Posted on 12/31/14 at 1:31 pm to okietiger
would pay it to bring him back
Posted on 12/31/14 at 1:32 pm to okietiger
Would gladly pay $3.4M for a good DC. Tired of seeing the shitshow that is our defense.
Posted on 12/31/14 at 1:34 pm to okietiger
1. A&M needs defense in the worst way.
2. At a minimum, it costs LSU time and effort to try to replace Chavis.
3. It allows Sumlin to entrust 1/2 his team to an expert and focus on recruiting and other areas of improvement.
I give it a 12 out of 10.
2. At a minimum, it costs LSU time and effort to try to replace Chavis.
3. It allows Sumlin to entrust 1/2 his team to an expert and focus on recruiting and other areas of improvement.
I give it a 12 out of 10.
Posted on 12/31/14 at 1:58 pm to Tridentds
Guess you misread the OP.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News