Started By
Message
UT Match Ups - Conference Games Only
Posted on 11/20/14 at 7:55 pm
Posted on 11/20/14 at 7:55 pm
Rushing
MU Offense #6 172 ypg
UT Defense #10 191.67 ypg
Edge: Mizzou - Mizzou has to stick to the running game like they did with A&M. I don't expect another 200 yard game from Hansbrough, but they need to establish the run to make Mauk's life easier and to negate the UT pass rush.
UT Offense #10 147.33 ypg
MU Defense #3 118.67 ypg
Edge: Mizzou - I had thought UT was putting up more impressive numbers with Hurd than they really are, though they are still solid. Mizzou has been staunch against the run though. Containing Dobbs and maintaining gaps will be critical though.
Passing
MU Offense #14 134.3 ypg
UT Defense #6 209.5 ypg
Edge: UT - I'd love to say the passing game has changed at Mizzou, and it has, but this one is still no contest. UT is pretty solid defending the pass and even better getting after the passer. Mauk is going to have to avoid getting happy feet and avoid the panic throws he is susceptible of at times.
UT Offense #6 246.7 ypg
MU Defense #3 187.8 ypg
Edge: Mizzou - Dobbs' numbers throwing the ball are slightly better than Worley's but UT is the worst in the league at giving up sacks and with an apparently healthy Golden back, Webb and Penton back from their time outs, I'm giving an edge to Mizzou when UT throws the ball.
I don't know enough about the special teams other than I'd put up Marcus Murphy against almost anyone and I'd pretty much take anyone's kicker over ours. So call it a push.
At the end of the day, all the numbers probably don't matter. As always, it will probably come down to penalties and turnovers. UT(#3) far and away holds an edge on penalties, committing only 4.8 per game for 37.5 ypg. MU(#13) commits 9 per game for 68.2 ypg. Mizzou must be more disciplined this game. We saw in the A&M game how they can be drive killers.
As for turnovers, Mizzou fairs better, coming in #4 in the conference at a +0.33 turnover margin. UT comes in just the opposite, at #9 with a -0.33 turnover margin. Some will say that will change with Dobbs, and maybe it will. He has given up 2 of the 7 INT's in conference play but he threw against Bama, UK and SC whereas Worley with the other 5 threw against UGA, UF and OM. Additionally, Mizzou has only lost 1 fumble all year and UT has lost 5.
I'm going with Mizzou 34 UT 24
MU Offense #6 172 ypg
UT Defense #10 191.67 ypg
Edge: Mizzou - Mizzou has to stick to the running game like they did with A&M. I don't expect another 200 yard game from Hansbrough, but they need to establish the run to make Mauk's life easier and to negate the UT pass rush.
UT Offense #10 147.33 ypg
MU Defense #3 118.67 ypg
Edge: Mizzou - I had thought UT was putting up more impressive numbers with Hurd than they really are, though they are still solid. Mizzou has been staunch against the run though. Containing Dobbs and maintaining gaps will be critical though.
Passing
MU Offense #14 134.3 ypg
UT Defense #6 209.5 ypg
Edge: UT - I'd love to say the passing game has changed at Mizzou, and it has, but this one is still no contest. UT is pretty solid defending the pass and even better getting after the passer. Mauk is going to have to avoid getting happy feet and avoid the panic throws he is susceptible of at times.
UT Offense #6 246.7 ypg
MU Defense #3 187.8 ypg
Edge: Mizzou - Dobbs' numbers throwing the ball are slightly better than Worley's but UT is the worst in the league at giving up sacks and with an apparently healthy Golden back, Webb and Penton back from their time outs, I'm giving an edge to Mizzou when UT throws the ball.
I don't know enough about the special teams other than I'd put up Marcus Murphy against almost anyone and I'd pretty much take anyone's kicker over ours. So call it a push.
At the end of the day, all the numbers probably don't matter. As always, it will probably come down to penalties and turnovers. UT(#3) far and away holds an edge on penalties, committing only 4.8 per game for 37.5 ypg. MU(#13) commits 9 per game for 68.2 ypg. Mizzou must be more disciplined this game. We saw in the A&M game how they can be drive killers.
As for turnovers, Mizzou fairs better, coming in #4 in the conference at a +0.33 turnover margin. UT comes in just the opposite, at #9 with a -0.33 turnover margin. Some will say that will change with Dobbs, and maybe it will. He has given up 2 of the 7 INT's in conference play but he threw against Bama, UK and SC whereas Worley with the other 5 threw against UGA, UF and OM. Additionally, Mizzou has only lost 1 fumble all year and UT has lost 5.
I'm going with Mizzou 34 UT 24
Posted on 11/20/14 at 10:04 pm to reedus23
Nice analysis. And I'm with you in feeling Mizzou.
Is there a weather forecast out there for Saturday night?
Posted on 11/20/14 at 10:08 pm to reedus23
You stole my schtick got damnit!!!
Posted on 11/20/14 at 10:34 pm to JesusQuintana
quote:
You stole my schtick got damnit!!!
Sorry man. Put yours up. I'd be interested in what you have to say about it. I was looking for it and guess I wasn't patient enough.
Posted on 11/20/14 at 10:37 pm to Mizz-SEC
quote:
Is there a weather forecast out there for Saturday night?
Looks like upper 50's and cloudy.
Posted on 11/20/14 at 10:51 pm to reedus23
I'm just kidding man. You did a good job. I'm pretty much in agreement with you.
Posted on 11/21/14 at 8:53 am to reedus23
There is one thing that's a little skewed.
Almost every sack has been Worley. Since Dobbs has come in, He's only been sacked three times to Worley's 30. The kid can scramble like Worley couldn't. We have to keep him bottled up.
Almost every sack has been Worley. Since Dobbs has come in, He's only been sacked three times to Worley's 30. The kid can scramble like Worley couldn't. We have to keep him bottled up.
This post was edited on 11/21/14 at 9:51 am
Posted on 11/21/14 at 10:58 am to Stlox
quote:
Almost every sack has been Worley. Since Dobbs has come in, He's only been sacked three times to Worley's 30. The kid can scramble like Worley couldn't. We have to keep him bottled up.
I think what is important about that number is it shows their OLine is horrendous. I agree that his legs will make sacks more difficult bu it tells me we should have success getting pressure on Dobbs and from there, it's a matter of containing him. A DLine that is one of the best at getting into the backfield and an OLine that is one of the worst at allowing defenses into the backfield should equate to us spending a majority of the day in their backfield. From there, like I said, contain him and hold your gaps.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News