Started By
Message

Does the SEC play too many cupcakes compared to the other conferences?

Posted on 9/9/14 at 9:29 am
Posted by Tigerman97
Member since Jun 2014
10354 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 9:29 am
LINK
This post was edited on 9/9/14 at 9:32 am
Posted by CapstoneGrad06
Little Rock
Member since Nov 2008
72142 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 9:31 am to
Too*
Posted by MrAUTigers
Florida
Member since Sep 2013
28280 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 9:32 am to
Fat girls want to be asked for a dance also.
Posted by Tigerman97
Member since Jun 2014
10354 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 9:32 am to
Thanks
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79115 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 9:34 am to
Moreover, it doesn't matter when one power 5 conference is considerably stronger than the other 4, and far, far, stronger than at least 2 of the other power 5 conferences.
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57002 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 9:34 am to
No
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
79978 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 9:36 am to
UCLA is the only power 5 school that plays at least 2 power 5 schools AND only FBS schools.
This post was edited on 9/9/14 at 11:00 am
Posted by cyde
He gone
Member since Nov 2005
31793 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 9:47 am to
School from other conferences play plenty of cupcakes -- every season during conference play.
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57002 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 9:48 am to
quote:

UCLA is the only power 5 school that plays at least 2 power 5 schools.


UGA does quite often

Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54132 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 9:52 am to
Comparing schedules should be about comparing the strength of the whole schedule. This fascination with looking at only ooc games is dumb when looking at strength of schedule.

As it relates to the overall quality of cfb, everyone plays too many cupcakes.

Should be a minimum of 10 power 5 games on every power 5 schedule and a max of 1 fcs opponent.
This post was edited on 9/9/14 at 9:53 am
Posted by Landmass
Member since Jun 2013
18066 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 9:54 am to
YES! .... but we have a much tougher conference schedule so we also play tougher competition. I think it all balances out.
This post was edited on 9/9/14 at 4:07 pm
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57002 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 9:56 am to
quote:

Comparing schedules should be about comparing the strength of the whole schedule.


it was kind of funny on saturday, on one side they were bitching about the SEC's creampuff schedule, then the other side they were talking about how brutal most of the SEC's schedules were. Got to drive the ratings/clicks somehow
Posted by polydorr
Member since Nov 2013
1385 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 10:41 am to
Not directly related to OP, but it's amazing how non-SEC types want to bitch about the SEC playing 2 or 3 cupcakes. When you consider the top 5 games on any given SEC team's schedule for the year, they are generally much harder than other conference's teams. To me that's what matters, and that's all that should matter. Not whether you played a schedule of 5 or 6 middling weaklings masquerading as conference foes.
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
139779 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 10:42 am to
Not when some entire conferences are cupcakes.
Posted by whiskeyjohn
Member since Aug 2013
1153 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 10:54 am to
quote:

Not when some entire conferences are cupcakes.


Agree.

Break down what we know so far this season.

Pac 12 - Oregon looks good. UCLA, Stanford, and USC will not scare anyone.

Big 12 - Oklahoma and Baylor. After that... pretty average overall.

B1G - Mich State is solid... even in the loss to Oregon. The rest... average.

ACC - Fla State and... maybe Va Tech.

SEC - Bama, Auburn. A&M, Ga look to be as good or better than anybody listed above. Throw in the Miss schools, LSU, and Mizzou and once again everyone knows why the SEC is the best conference.
Posted by Mudflap007
The big D
Member since Sep 2013
216 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 11:13 am to
Other conferences get their cupcakes in house.

The SEC has to go out.

Posted by Crimson Legend
Mount St Gumpus
Member since Nov 2004
15478 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 11:21 am to
It's all noise to me. I expect my team to schedule one strong nonconference opponent each year to add to the SEC slate. Two is gravy.

Scheduling an entire nonconference slate of pushovers is a little ridiculous. But if you play an SEC schedule and add one legitimate nonconference team, nobody has a legitimate gripe - ESPECIALLY teams that play in weaker conferences.

Posted by goatman1419
Prairieville,LA
Member since Jan 2007
3070 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 11:33 am to
To answer this simply. All other conferences are 3/4 cupcakes. So why they say our OOC games are cupcakes. Their OOC and in conference schedules are shite. Just a pansy excuse to say something that they think they have a one up on the SEC.
Posted by Gradual_Stroke
Bee Cave, TX
Member since Oct 2012
20917 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 11:36 am to
The other conferences are made up of all cupcakes and one or two decent teams. This isn't the case in tSEC west
Posted by goatman1419
Prairieville,LA
Member since Jan 2007
3070 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 11:40 am to
quote:

Throw in the Miss schools, LSU, and Mizzou


One is not like the others.
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter