Started By
Message
SEC East: Rank the position groups
Posted on 8/25/14 at 9:38 am
Posted on 8/25/14 at 9:38 am
Here's mine
QB (incredibly difficult to do, but..)
Mizzou
UGA
USC
UF
Vandy
UK
UT
RB
UGA
USC
UF
Vandy
Mizzou
UT
UK
WR/TE
UT
UGA
UF
USC
Mizzou
Vandy
UK
OL
USC
UGA
Mizzou
UF
UK
Vandy
UT
DL
Mizzou
UF
UK
UGA
USC
Vandy
UT
LB
UGA
UF
UT
USC
Mizzou
UK
Vandy
DB
UF
UGA
Mizzou
USC
UT
UK
Vandy
Thoughts?
QB (incredibly difficult to do, but..)
Mizzou
UGA
USC
UF
Vandy
UK
UT
RB
UGA
USC
UF
Vandy
Mizzou
UT
UK
WR/TE
UT
UGA
UF
USC
Mizzou
Vandy
UK
OL
USC
UGA
Mizzou
UF
UK
Vandy
UT
DL
Mizzou
UF
UK
UGA
USC
Vandy
UT
LB
UGA
UF
UT
USC
Mizzou
UK
Vandy
DB
UF
UGA
Mizzou
USC
UT
UK
Vandy
Thoughts?
This post was edited on 8/25/14 at 9:50 am
10
Posted on 8/25/14 at 9:39 am to JesusQuintana
Our DBs should be a bit higher (USCe and UGA have big time problems in the secondary), our QB should should be a bit higher (beat a top 5 team last year, almost beat UGA), and our RBs should be one or 2 spots higher (based off Hurd's potential) IMO, but overall good list.
This post was edited on 8/25/14 at 9:42 am
Posted on 8/25/14 at 9:40 am to JesusQuintana
quote:
LB
UF
UGA
lulz
Posted on 8/25/14 at 9:41 am to JesusQuintana
quote:
QB (incredibly difficult to do, but..)
Agreed.
quote:
RB
UGA
USC
UF
Vandy
Mizzou
UT
UK
Accurate
quote:
WR/TE
UT
UGA
UF
USC
Mizzou
Vandy
UK
I'd switch 1 and 2 but it looks alright.
quote:
OL
USC
UGA
Mizzou
UF
UK
Vandy
UT
I'd switch 2 and 3
quote:
DL
Mizzou
UF
UK
UGA
USC
Vandy
UT
I'd definitely move Mizzou down and UGA up. We have experience and depth there.
quote:
LB
UF
UGA
UT
USC
Mizzou
UK
Vandy
Idk about that. I'd put our lb's up against anyone in the country.
quote:
DB
UF
UGA
Mizzou
USC
UT
UK
Vandy
This is more of a crapshoot than QB
Posted on 8/25/14 at 9:43 am to gatorhata9
Yeah, DB was hard as well. Not a lot of proven guys returning so I weighted that heavily.
Posted on 8/25/14 at 9:45 am to JesusQuintana
LBs flip UGA and UF. Floyd and Wilson had better years last year than Taylor, Morrison, and Ball.
DL- UF should be higher than Mizzou, UF is returning everyone except Easley. Fowler and Bullard are beasts. Mizzou lost both DEs.
DL- UF should be higher than Mizzou, UF is returning everyone except Easley. Fowler and Bullard are beasts. Mizzou lost both DEs.
Posted on 8/25/14 at 9:49 am to BloodSweat&Beers
Golden and Ray are beast as well and we return our entire DT rotation. I'm sticking on that one, but seems a consensus on the LBs so I'll flip those two.
Posted on 8/25/14 at 10:04 am to BloodSweat&Beers
Ray and Golden should be just as good, if not better than Ealy and Sam. That assumption is based off their actual previous in-game performances, not mere expectations/potential. We return everyone on our two-deep at DT. Mizzou will be stacked on the DL.
This post was edited on 8/25/14 at 10:05 am
Posted on 8/25/14 at 10:07 am to JesusQuintana
Fowler and Bullard are proven studs especially Fowler. Proven > Unproven
Posted on 8/25/14 at 10:10 am to BloodSweat&Beers
quote:
That assumption is based off their actual previous in-game performances, not mere expectations/potential.
Ray and Golden are proven studs, as well.
Posted on 8/25/14 at 10:20 am to JesusQuintana
quote:
DL
Mizzou
UF
UK
UGA
USC
Vandy
UT
Not a bad list, but UGA should be higher here
Posted on 8/25/14 at 10:30 am to JesusQuintana
quote:
QB (incredibly difficult to do, but..)
Mizzou
UGA
USC
UF
Vandy
UK
UT
I think this is good but I'd put Thompson over Mason for now. I am with you on Mauk.
quote:
RB
UGA
USC
UF
Vandy
Mizzou
UT
UK
Yep
quote:
WR/TE
UT
UGA
UF
USC
Mizzou
Vandy
UK
I'd take our depth over UT but still valid. I'd give USCe over UF because, well, UF hasn't proven me wrong for a while.
quote:
OL
USC
UGA
Mizzou
UF
UK
Vandy
UT
I always think UGA should be lower on this. USC is in a class of it's own this year in the East
quote:
DL
Mizzou
UF
UK
UGA
USC
Vandy
UT
UF is better than everyone. Too ignorant on the rest.
quote:
LB
UGA
UF
UT
USC
Mizzou
UK
Vandy
Works for me
quote:
DB
UF
UGA
Mizzou
USC
UT
UK
Vandy
UGA has too much unproven back there to be that high
I think you did a damn fine job
Posted on 8/25/14 at 10:36 am to Damn Good Dawg
Mauk has had a pretty poor fall camp. 1st scrimmage was about what we hoped for. The last 2 scrimmages, his completion percentage fell well below 50%. With so many new QB's it's hard to rank exactly where' they'll end up, but at this point, I wouldn't have Mauk sitting on top. Somewhere around 3 or 4 sounds about right. Won't argue 2 or 5 either though.
Posted on 8/25/14 at 10:41 am to reedus23
I think it's him and Thompson for the East. I think Mason is in their tier but I think he's the 3rd guy. He has more weapons to play with but I think talent-wise he's behind both. I just really like Mauk's grit and talent level and Thompson has the experience except, idk, he gives off a vibe to me that he isn't gonna excel in the big moment. He kind of folded in on himself vs yall. He didn't choke but he didn't do anything either. He flatlined. Mason, on the other hand, in the same position as Thompson, was the opposite. Started off atrocious vs Nebraska and very timid vs GT and then came back with his head on fire vs both.
Then there is Mauk who just balled out vs Okie Lite and co. And then our defense which I found very disappointing.
Then there is Mauk who just balled out vs Okie Lite and co. And then our defense which I found very disappointing.
Posted on 8/25/14 at 10:48 am to JesusQuintana
I think the DB ranking for UGA is too high.
Posted on 8/25/14 at 11:01 am to JesusQuintana
QB:
UF
USC
UM
UGA
UT
VU
UK
RB:
UGA
USC
UF
UT
VU
MU
UK
WR/TE:
UGA
USC
UT
MU
VU
UK
UF
OL:
USC
UGA
VU
MU
UK
UF
UT
DL:
UF
UGA
USC
UM
VU
UK
UT
LB:
UGA
UF
USC
UT
MU
VU
UK
DB:
UF
MU
USC
UGA
UT
UK
VU
UF
USC
UM
UGA
UT
VU
UK
RB:
UGA
USC
UF
UT
VU
MU
UK
WR/TE:
UGA
USC
UT
MU
VU
UK
UF
OL:
USC
UGA
VU
MU
UK
UF
UT
DL:
UF
UGA
USC
UM
VU
UK
UT
LB:
UGA
UF
USC
UT
MU
VU
UK
DB:
UF
MU
USC
UGA
UT
UK
VU
Posted on 8/25/14 at 11:04 am to JesusQuintana
QB
1. Mizz
2. SC
3. UF
4. UGA
5. Tenn
6. UK
7. Vandy
RB
1. UGA
2. Vandy
3. SC
4. Fla
5. Tenn
6. Mizz
7. KY
WR
1. Tenn
2. SC
3. UGA
4. Mizz
5. Fla
6. UK
7. Vandy
OL
1. SC
2. Mizz
3. Vandy
4. UGA
5. UK
6. Fla
7. Tenn
DL
1. Fla
2. UGA
3. KY
4. Mizz
5. SC
6. Tenn
7. Vandy
LB
1. UGA
2. Tenn
3. Fla
4. SC
5. Mizz
6. Vandy
7. KY
DB
1. Fla
2. Tenn
3. SC
4. Mizz
5. Vandy
6. UGA
7. KY
1. Mizz
2. SC
3. UF
4. UGA
5. Tenn
6. UK
7. Vandy
RB
1. UGA
2. Vandy
3. SC
4. Fla
5. Tenn
6. Mizz
7. KY
WR
1. Tenn
2. SC
3. UGA
4. Mizz
5. Fla
6. UK
7. Vandy
OL
1. SC
2. Mizz
3. Vandy
4. UGA
5. UK
6. Fla
7. Tenn
DL
1. Fla
2. UGA
3. KY
4. Mizz
5. SC
6. Tenn
7. Vandy
LB
1. UGA
2. Tenn
3. Fla
4. SC
5. Mizz
6. Vandy
7. KY
DB
1. Fla
2. Tenn
3. SC
4. Mizz
5. Vandy
6. UGA
7. KY
Posted on 8/25/14 at 11:06 am to JesusQuintana
I'm sorry the team with the only returning starter at QB- a guy with an 8-1 record in SEC play is 4th in the East, that's laughable.
Posted on 8/25/14 at 11:08 am to socraticsilence
quote:
the team with the only returning starter at QB
that's teeeeeeeechnically not true..
Posted on 8/25/14 at 11:14 am to WG_Dawg
quote:
the team with the only returning starter at QB
that's teeeeeeeechnically not true..
Wait, was Mason hurt for 4 years and that's why spot starter Aaron Murray came in? Murray was one hell of a back up QB then.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News