Started By
Message
So what was our secondary violation for?
Posted on 7/16/14 at 7:52 am
Posted on 7/16/14 at 7:52 am
Anyone know? Was it the Rashaan Evans thing or what?
What kind of punishment did we impose?
What kind of punishment did we impose?
This post was edited on 7/16/14 at 7:53 am
3
Posted on 7/16/14 at 8:04 am to Weagle25
We had multiple secondary, so do most schools. no penalties. The Rashad Evans deal was someone accessing information that was hidden (hacked). We strengthened security to handle.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 8:07 am to allin2010
I know most schools have secondary violations but I always thought there was some little punishment with it. Guess I was wrong.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 8:07 am to Weagle25
The AD sends a yearly report of all the secondary violations committed among all sports over that year span. June 30th is the end of that year-span...so the violations were released to the media after 2 weeks
Punishment is normally done by the school directly after the violation occurs. The AD sends the report at the end of the year along with the punishments handed out...if the NCAA doesn't think the punishment was sufficient, they can hand out something more severe
Punishment is normally done by the school directly after the violation occurs. The AD sends the report at the end of the year along with the punishments handed out...if the NCAA doesn't think the punishment was sufficient, they can hand out something more severe
This post was edited on 7/16/14 at 8:10 am
Posted on 7/16/14 at 8:09 am to The Nino
quote:
The AD sends a yearly report of all the secondary violations committed among all sports over that year span. June 30th is the end of that year-span...so the violations were released to the media after 2 weeks
Learn something new everyday.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 8:11 am to Weagle25
That's my understanding of it. It might be slightly off
Posted on 7/16/14 at 8:25 am to allin2010
"hacked"
Posted on 7/16/14 at 10:02 am to allin2010
quote:
The Rashad Evans deal was someone accessing information that was hidden (hacked).
I'm not gonna get in the middle of the fight some are in over on the rant, but come on guys, this was not a "hack"
the university had made the pages before NSD thinking these people might sign
just as on NSD http ://www. auburn tigers.com/signingday/bios.html?player=j-ford (from 2013) was Johnathon Ford's signee URL, someone easily just put "r-evans" or something along those lines. The site was live but not linked yet.
It was a small frickup by the department, they clearly just said "hack" for lack of a better word, and some of you are looking dumb acting like this was some in depth hack
anyone could have done it
This post was edited on 7/16/14 at 10:03 am
Posted on 7/16/14 at 10:06 am to beaver
I agree. It seems like a mistake by someone in the AD department. But its a small violation, I believe. Not that big a deal besides other fanbases making fun of it. I dont really care. 
Posted on 7/16/14 at 10:34 am to beaver
quote:
I'm not gonna get in the middle of the fight some are in over on the rant, but come on guys, this was not a "hack"
Hack is more easy to say instead of trying to explain that someone modified a URL that lead to an active, but non-launched BIO page.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 10:46 am to WDE1980
quote:
Hack is more easy to say instead of trying to explain that someone modified a URL that lead to an active, but non-launched BIO page.
Easier, and wrong, because it implies a member of the media did something malicious or wrong.
If they just stuck with 'hey we did this for all recruits' 95% of people would understand and move on.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 10:53 am to polydorr
So a buddy just texted me about the validity of rumors about us paying players and grade eligibility from 2011.
Anybody have any clue what the frick he is talking about?
Anybody have any clue what the frick he is talking about?
Posted on 7/16/14 at 10:54 am to Weagle25
I think we self-imposed punishment on most of these. Minor things like not recruiting off-campus for 2 weeks or similar.
The NCAA could decide to take it further, but I doubt it.
This just reiterates how asinine the whole NCAA system is that schools have to pay a staff of people to monitor this stuff.
The NCAA could decide to take it further, but I doubt it.
This just reiterates how asinine the whole NCAA system is that schools have to pay a staff of people to monitor this stuff.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 10:55 am to GoCrazyAuburn
I would think there would be something on the rant about it if it were true or something on the internet. Dude is probably frickin with you...hopefully
Posted on 7/16/14 at 11:00 am to AUtigerNOLA
I do too. He is an auburn fan, just doesnt keep up with most stuff. Says it is all over facebook right now.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 11:02 am to GoCrazyAuburn
I dont see anything on the internet about it besides the Selena Roberts report crap from 2013 which talks about paid players and grades.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 11:03 am to AUtigerNOLA
He is pretty internet illiterate, so i bet that is it. I'll report once i verify.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 11:21 am to GoCrazyAuburn
Yea, it was the Roberts article.
PSA Announcement: Friends don't let stupid friends run unsupervised on the internets.
PSA Announcement: Friends don't let stupid friends run unsupervised on the internets.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 11:22 am to GoCrazyAuburn
Posted on 7/16/14 at 11:43 am to GoCrazyAuburn
did his alabama friend show it to him
Page 1 of 2
Latest Auburn News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News