Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

BLM to attempt to seize private land in Texas/Okla

Posted on 4/22/14 at 10:43 am
Posted by cokebottleag
I’m a Santos Republican
Member since Aug 2011
24028 posts
Posted on 4/22/14 at 10:43 am
Cliffs: The BLM wants to use the excuse of a dispute in the boundary between Texas and Oklahoma to seize private property.

quote:

“In Texas,” Miller says, “the BLM is attempting a repeat of an action taken over 30 years ago along the Red River when Tommy Henderson lost a federal lawsuit. The Bureau of Land Management took 140 acres of his property and didn’t pay him one cent.”
Miller referred to a 1986 case where the BLM attempted to seize some of Henderson’s land. Henderson sued the BLM and lost 140 acres that had been in his family for generations. Now the BLM is looking at using the prior case as a precedent to claim an additional 90,000 acres.


quote:

Congressman Mac Thornberry (R-TX) represents the ranchers in this region of north Texas. According to Thornberry’s legislative analysts, the issue of the ownership of this land dates back to the Louisiana Purchase of 1803. When the BLM made the claim on Henderson’s land, their position was that Texas never had the authority to deed the land to private parties and therefore it would fall under federal control.


LINK

Should the militias that assisted Bundy assist the ranchers here? Per the Constitution, it is actually illegal for the feds to own land except:
quote:

To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings
Posted by heartbreakTiger
grinding for my grinders
Member since Jan 2008
138974 posts
Posted on 4/22/14 at 10:46 am to
I expect Texas to put up a fight while Oklahoma cowers in the corner.
Posted by cokebottleag
I’m a Santos Republican
Member since Aug 2011
24028 posts
Posted on 4/22/14 at 10:48 am to
quote:

In 1922, the U.S. Supreme Court attempted to settle the boundary dispute in Oklahoma v. Texas and declared the boundary to be defined by wooden stakes set on the river bank. That boundary apparently lasted no longer than anyone could expect wooden stakes to last in the shifting sands of a meandering river. In 2000, Texas and Oklahoma’s legislatures agreed to a “Red River Boundary Compact” which defined the border between the states as the southern vegetation line. However, Congress must ratify agreements of this kind between the states according to Article 1, Section 10 (Clause 3) of the U.S. Constitution. Congressman Thornberry introduced House Joint Resolution 72 during the 106th Congress to codify the compact into U.S. Law.
The matter became somewhat of a national question drawing the attention of Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, “The U.S. Supreme Court has tried twice to settle this dispute, which at one point brought the governor of Oklahoma to the border in a tank…However, true to the slogan 'One Riot, One Ranger,' the good governor of Oklahoma and his tank was held off by a lone Texas Ranger on his horse."


This post was edited on 4/22/14 at 10:50 am
Posted by Porter Osborne Jr
Member since Sep 2012
39990 posts
Posted on 4/22/14 at 11:54 am to
Posted by davesdawgs
Georgia - Class of '75
Member since Oct 2008
20307 posts
Posted on 4/22/14 at 12:26 pm to
Another Obama power grab?
Posted by MasterofTigerBait
Member since May 2009
7592 posts
Posted on 4/22/14 at 12:41 pm to
quote:

Another Obama power grab?




lolz
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
90552 posts
Posted on 4/22/14 at 1:16 pm to
This is worse than the Nevada deal. This is taking privately owned land from people who pay property tax on it. There will be a fight if they try to do this.

The border dispute is a govt problem and needs to be settled without taking private land. Once settled if land previously deeded by texas is deemed on the Oklahoma side then Ok should be required to issue a deed on that property at no expense to the owner.

The land owners are not in violation of any laws and do not deserve to lose their property
Posted by wmr
North of Dickson, South of Herman's
Member since Mar 2009
32518 posts
Posted on 4/22/14 at 2:42 pm to
I don't know. Okies like their freedom. They'll put a boot in your arse, its the American way.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter