Started By
Message
Apparently we lost another one today.
Posted on 3/18/13 at 10:08 pm
Posted on 3/18/13 at 10:08 pm
Another had by the rant, and likely the inability to lurk for long enough to realize what this place is.
To you, I give a
Goodnight Sweet Prince/Princess.
Also, if anyone knows who it was, let us know.
To you, I give a
Goodnight Sweet Prince/Princess.
Also, if anyone knows who it was, let us know.
Posted on 3/18/13 at 10:28 pm to Mizzeaux
I am still on self prescribed LOA from the rant and TB, and only looking at MSB, after a 3 day abstention.
In the meantime, I completed my Conceal & Carry class and have submitted application for license. Funny that it is legal to carry a visible gun in ks, but it costs over $225 to keep it hidden. As for visible packing, each city may override by an ordinance. But the CCL is accepted by all municipalities.
In the meantime, I completed my Conceal & Carry class and have submitted application for license. Funny that it is legal to carry a visible gun in ks, but it costs over $225 to keep it hidden. As for visible packing, each city may override by an ordinance. But the CCL is accepted by all municipalities.
Posted on 3/18/13 at 11:05 pm to Bogie00
I've got the same here. Nevada is open carry, and I've done it from time to time.
However, the court loves to shite on CCW people that happen to brandish at a legally incorrect time since CCW people are considered a sort of expert after the licensing process.
If I'm carrying outside of the home, I'm carrying open. Less legal issues here where there's not a ton of cities/towns to worry about weird laws, and the home pretty much protects the homeowner legally unless you're plinking people off from the balcony.
Congrats, BTW.
However, the court loves to shite on CCW people that happen to brandish at a legally incorrect time since CCW people are considered a sort of expert after the licensing process.
If I'm carrying outside of the home, I'm carrying open. Less legal issues here where there's not a ton of cities/towns to worry about weird laws, and the home pretty much protects the homeowner legally unless you're plinking people off from the balcony.
Congrats, BTW.
This post was edited on 3/18/13 at 11:07 pm
Posted on 3/19/13 at 12:01 am to Mizzeaux
This is bullshite. I am tired of our own getting banned. Not even a fair trial or a chance to be revived!
Posted on 3/19/13 at 12:03 am to Stripes314
Was it mogray for that Penis-Chicken?
Posted on 3/19/13 at 12:10 am to Stripes314
I missed it. How does one find out?
Posted on 3/19/13 at 12:13 am to reedus23
Well I dont see the thread anymore. I am confident he was RA'ed as Arkys started bragging that he would get the hammer.
Posted on 3/19/13 at 12:19 am to Stripes314
Yeah, I missed it all. I saw the back and forth flaming but pretty much ignored it.
Posted on 3/19/13 at 12:22 am to reedus23
He made a thread earlier I believe called "The New South Carolina Logo"
It was a picture of a dick with chicken wings jumping in the same way their logo does now. It was a drawing. Thats all I could have seen a Missourian getting banned for today. I am sure he was RA'ed for it and I dont see the thread anymore.
It was a picture of a dick with chicken wings jumping in the same way their logo does now. It was a drawing. Thats all I could have seen a Missourian getting banned for today. I am sure he was RA'ed for it and I dont see the thread anymore.
Posted on 3/19/13 at 12:31 am to Stripes314
They do seem to have us on a short leash.
Then again, we do seem to do our best to get their attention.
Then again, we do seem to do our best to get their attention.
Posted on 3/19/13 at 12:37 am to Mizzeaux
I wish we could at least get kilo and SoCal back.
Posted on 3/19/13 at 8:45 am to Stripes314
Yeah it was mograyback for the penis thread. Anyone would have been banned for that one. They have a pretty strict no porn rule. That's about the only thing that will get you banned immediately no matter your previous posting history.
Posted on 3/19/13 at 9:34 am to TheCheshireHog
Yeah, that would do it. I would like to see kilo and socal back though. I think we'd be better served trying to just get those 2 re-instated than the whole group. Trying to get everyone at one time likely won't happen and I don't think kilo and socal's "infractions" were that serious and they don't have a history of venturing into ban land.
Posted on 3/19/13 at 9:46 am to Stripes314
quote:
I wish we could at least get kilo and SoCal back.
Same here. I don't know why kilo got the hammer, but SoCal was intentional on his part. I think he decided a ban would give him time for personal pursuits. But he did say he would try to come back later.
My guess is that Moygray also knew he would get banned for the display of private anatomy. Although, he may have thought a drawing would escape censor. Seriously, too many folks that would complain and report. So why risk it?
Back In my high school days, lots of folks in class of "69" (and even some who graduated in other years) had fun brandishing the symbol. It is a once in a century opportunity.
Posted on 3/19/13 at 10:45 am to Bogie00
It may have been one of my alters. Let me check with all of them and I'll respond soon...
Posted on 3/19/13 at 10:54 am to mizzoukills
Yep...just as I thought. My alters confirmed that it was Chief Alter in Charge - Mogray.
It's a sad day.
Oh well, time to create a new alter.
It's a sad day.
Oh well, time to create a new alter.
Posted on 3/19/13 at 10:57 am to mizzoukills
I think Mogray may of flip-flopped on every position he took on here. He was really trying to rustle up the Arkys yesterday.
Posted on 3/19/13 at 11:08 am to Stripes314
quote:
I think Mogray may of flip-flopped on every position he took on here. He was really trying to rustle up the Arkys yesterday.
I find that ironic because I could have sworn he was the one that was giving all the other Mizzou posters trouble for saying outlandish things.
Posted on 3/19/13 at 11:10 am to reedus23
I respected it at first, but it started to get more and more strange. He completely lost my respect with his comments on DGB. He prob should have been banned a long time ago.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News