Started By
Message
2011-2012 Football Profit (Texas #1; SEC Dominates top 10)
Posted on 12/13/12 at 10:26 am
Posted on 12/13/12 at 10:26 am
LINK
The disparity between Texas and other schools in the Big 12 is quite apparent. Big 10 not much different.
SEC's traditional schools are relatively close to each other. Alabama has highest expenses.
Penn St. dropped from 2nd to out of the top 10.
The disparity between Texas and other schools in the Big 12 is quite apparent. Big 10 not much different.
SEC's traditional schools are relatively close to each other. Alabama has highest expenses.
Penn St. dropped from 2nd to out of the top 10.
This post was edited on 12/13/12 at 10:26 am
8
Posted on 12/13/12 at 10:28 am to BaylorTiger
Where is aTm?
Posted on 12/13/12 at 10:29 am to BaylorTiger
quote:And highest revenue.
Alabama has highest expenses.
Posted on 12/13/12 at 10:29 am to BaylorTiger
Pretty large gap between Texas and the top SEC schools.
Texas's profit margin is 60% greater than bama, lsu, and AU which are all pretty much the same.
Texas's profit margin is 60% greater than bama, lsu, and AU which are all pretty much the same.
Posted on 12/13/12 at 10:30 am to BaylorTiger
Georgia #1. Way to go McGarity.
Posted on 12/13/12 at 10:31 am to Tiger n Miami AU83
According to this site, Bama's athletic dept. as a whole is 2nd in the country and gap between UTa and UA isn't nearly as large.
LINK
LINK
Posted on 12/13/12 at 10:33 am to genro
quote:
Pretty large gap between Texas and the top SEC schools.
SEC shares the revenue more; that's what I was trying to get at.
A&M was still in the SEC and under the old big 12 contract. They came in around $25mm profit.
Posted on 12/13/12 at 10:33 am to WG_Dawg
Summary:
AU and Bama spend significantly more than anyone else in the country and $10 million more than the next closest SEC teams of LSU, Arky, FL, UGA.
Bama, AU, FL, and UGA all take in about the same amount of money.
UGA and FL spend less, so have higher profit margins than AU/Bama.
AU and Bama spend significantly more than anyone else in the country and $10 million more than the next closest SEC teams of LSU, Arky, FL, UGA.
Bama, AU, FL, and UGA all take in about the same amount of money.
UGA and FL spend less, so have higher profit margins than AU/Bama.
Posted on 12/13/12 at 10:34 am to Tiger n Miami AU83
Is this why Jay Jacobs is still there? The boatloads of money he makes y'all.
Posted on 12/13/12 at 10:35 am to UAFanFromNOLA
quote:Auburn's athletic department as a whole does not bring in a lot. I've seen stats showing them in the red over the last 5 years.
Is this why Jay Jacobs is still there? The boatloads of money he makes y'all.
Posted on 12/13/12 at 10:35 am to genro
So only Mississippi College and Belhaven turn a profit in MS? I have been to a few MC games, don't know if that is correct...
Posted on 12/13/12 at 10:35 am to genro
quote:
According to this site, Bama's athletic dept. as a whole is 2nd in the country and gap between UTa and UA isn't nearly as large.
Site says 2010.
ESPN article is 2011-2012.
Posted on 12/13/12 at 10:36 am to genro
quote:
Auburn's athletic department as a whole does not bring in a lot. I've seen stats showing them in the red over the last 5 years.
bullshite.
Posted on 12/13/12 at 10:36 am to UAFanFromNOLA
quote:
Is this why Jay Jacobs is still there? The boatloads of money he makes y'all.
I'd say that is one reason. AU has profited every year he has been there. Not sure what the margins were when the previous AD was there...
Posted on 12/13/12 at 10:37 am to Aubie83
quote:
Not sure what the margins were when the previous AD was there...
We have been in the black since about 1982.
Posted on 12/13/12 at 10:37 am to LsuTool
quote:
Where is aTm?
This is last year's revenue, so Big XII exit fees are factored in. We should jump up considerably in 2012-2013, as exit fees will be gone, SEC has a much better TV deal, and our merchandising sales have gone up considerably.
Posted on 12/13/12 at 10:38 am to Tiger n Miami AU83
quote:
AU and Bama spend significantly more than anyone else in the country and $10 million more than the next closest SEC teams
Man, those bidding wars are hell in Alabama. No wonder State backed off of Cam.
Posted on 12/13/12 at 10:40 am to genro
I think Texas will drop a lot in that pretty soon. It's inflated with the Longhorn Network which I suspect is going to down hard in the near future as it continues to destroy the Big 12 and provide Texas with national exposure of being terrible.
Isn't the SEC Network coming around the corner? SEC teams get more money, SEC becomes more unstoppable?
Isn't the SEC Network coming around the corner? SEC teams get more money, SEC becomes more unstoppable?
Posted on 12/13/12 at 10:41 am to Tiger n Miami AU83
2006-2011:
Total athletic dept revenue and expenses
Profit-wise, Auburn's comes in at about $3.5MM
As opposed to
Bama: $19MM
Florida: $16MM
Georgia: $12MM
LSU: $16MM
LINK
And I will find that listing with them in the red, rest assured. Just give me a bit.
Total athletic dept revenue and expenses
Profit-wise, Auburn's comes in at about $3.5MM
As opposed to
Bama: $19MM
Florida: $16MM
Georgia: $12MM
LSU: $16MM
LINK
And I will find that listing with them in the red, rest assured. Just give me a bit.
This post was edited on 12/13/12 at 10:44 am
Posted on 12/13/12 at 10:48 am to genro
According to that website, Bama was in the red in 2008.
This post was edited on 12/13/12 at 10:49 am
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News