Bama Rbs vs LSU Rbs

This topic was discussed numerous times prior to Sat night. I have read a majority of the threads since Sat, but due to the sheer number, I have have missed this topic already being discussed.

So if it is germans, I will request an admin delete the thread.

With all of that out the way, I would like to share my opinion and then get all of your opinions on the topic.

Bama-

IMO, your best back is Yeldon. He has fantastic speed, good balance, and is very shifty. He doesn't just have straight line speed, he is very quick in and out of cuts. His shiftiness made it difficult for anyone on LSU's D to get a clean hit, he always seemed to be shifting side to side at the moment of impact... this means a much higher chance the defender whifs on a tackle. His weak point is strength. I don't mean he is weak, I just mean that out of a RBs skillset, strength is not his strong point. That can and will improve as he spends the next few years in a college S&C program.

LSU -

We finally got to see Hill for an entire game. He got over 100 yards rushing against a very good Bama defense. Bama did not allow him to make any huge plays, but he did an excellent job of turning nothing into 2-4 yards consistently.

At THIS point in time, I will say that Bama has THE better RB in yeldon. LSU still has the stable, which provides for more than adequate backups and a rotation of quality backs that can wear down SOME defenses (obviously not Bama, which is why we stuck with our best back for the majority of the game)

I know this is more or less what some concluded before the game, but now with the game having been played I think this opinion is more soldified.

The bottom line:

Hill and Yeldon are only freshman, both showed that they will be studs for their respective teams for the next couple of years (baring any major injuries)