Started By
Message
Now that Chizik is canned who had a better product?
Posted on 10/13/12 at 4:58 pm
Posted on 10/13/12 at 4:58 pm
Tubs or Chizik
I'm going with Tubs
I'm going with Tubs
Posted on 10/13/12 at 5:02 pm to plazadweller
Tubs overall. Chizik brought home the hardware.
Either way, doesn't help this abortion of a season
Either way, doesn't help this abortion of a season
Posted on 10/13/12 at 5:04 pm to TheJones
Tubbs...
He got snubbed in 2004.. Overall AU was ranked just about every season and competitive
He got snubbed in 2004.. Overall AU was ranked just about every season and competitive
Posted on 10/13/12 at 5:07 pm to plazadweller
Tubs and it's not even close.
Posted on 10/13/12 at 5:18 pm to TheJones
I just like the thought of Chizik already being told to pack his shite and go back to Kansas or wherever he calls home.
This post was edited on 10/13/12 at 5:19 pm
Posted on 10/13/12 at 5:24 pm to plazadweller
Tubs wouldn't have done much against Saban either.
We need a home run hire at head coach.
Nothing less or we won't be competitive.
We need a home run hire at head coach.
Nothing less or we won't be competitive.
Posted on 10/13/12 at 7:27 pm to aw4au14
Tubs' issue was that he wouldn't upgrade his staff when things began to get stale out of "loyalty.". If he had done that he'd still be there.
Latest Auburn News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News