Started By
Message
Preseason Polls vs. Week 1 Results
Posted on 8/27/12 at 10:27 pm
Posted on 8/27/12 at 10:27 pm
Will the polls swing in reverse if ranked teams lose in week 1? For example: If Michigan gets lucky and beats Alabama - should they move to No. 1, 2, or 3? Will Bama drop behind Michigan's current ranking?
If AU beats Clemson will they move up to 14 or better? My guess is - No to all of the above because the Polls are BS. It would be nice to see results show in the polls after the first week and leave the preseason hype alone
If AU beats Clemson will they move up to 14 or better? My guess is - No to all of the above because the Polls are BS. It would be nice to see results show in the polls after the first week and leave the preseason hype alone
5
Posted on 8/27/12 at 10:29 pm to AUX3
Jax State 
Posted on 8/27/12 at 10:29 pm to AUX3
Auburn beating Clemson does not mean Auburn is the #13 team in the nation. It would likely mean Clemson was overrated. Same thing for if Michigan beat Alabama.
Posted on 8/27/12 at 10:35 pm to Monticello
quote:
Auburn beating Clemson does not mean Auburn is the #13 team in the nation
Agree.
quote:
Same thing for if Michigan beat Alabama.
Uh, i wouldnt go that far. We would likely drop down to #8 about the same spot at Michigan now and Michigan would prob move up behind USC, Oregon, LSU, OU, Michigan.
Posted on 8/27/12 at 10:35 pm to AUX3
quote:
If Michigan gets lucky and beats Alabama
They would definitely be in the Top 5.
Posted on 8/27/12 at 10:36 pm to AUX3
Michigan shouldn't be in the top 20,what a frickin' joke.
Posted on 8/27/12 at 10:38 pm to Monticello
Bama would drop behind Michigan but Michigan wouldn't move to top 3, they'd be around top 5-7ish. Clemson would drop to the edge of the top 25/drop out and Auburn would be 18-21ish.
Posted on 8/27/12 at 10:38 pm to FightinTiga
If Michigan beats Bama, they would have the best win and would have a good argument to be No 1, certainly a better argument than USC.
Posted on 8/27/12 at 10:40 pm to AUX3
Auburn should be no better than 16 even if we destroyed Clemson. Which we will! :dancingbanana:
Posted on 8/27/12 at 10:44 pm to FightinTiga
quote:
Michigan shouldn't be in the top 20,what a frickin' joke.
Why? Who are some teams better than Michigan that should be moved to the top 20 instead of them?
Posted on 8/27/12 at 10:46 pm to Monticello
If Michigan beats Alabama, Bama wouldn't drop past #4...
Posted on 8/27/12 at 10:50 pm to FightinTiga
quote:
Michigan shouldn't be in the top 20,what a frickin' joke.
Hold your horses, fella.
Shoelace might not be able to hit the ocean if he was standing on the beach, but he's still an explosive play-maker and UM does return a great defense.
Posted on 8/27/12 at 10:52 pm to Monticello
quote:
Auburn beating Clemson does not mean Auburn is the #13 team in the nation. It would likely mean Clemson was overrated. Same thing for if Michigan beat Alabama.
No it would mean Clemson was overrated, and Michigan is just damn good and Alabama is #2 and should play them in a rematch in the NC game to make sure. You know this already
Posted on 8/27/12 at 10:53 pm to deltaland
quote:
No it would mean Clemson was overrated, and Michigan is just damn good and Alabama is #2 and should play them in a rematch in the NC game to make sure. You know this already
GTFO
Posted on 8/27/12 at 10:55 pm to CamdenTiger
quote:
If Michigan beats Alabama, Bama wouldn't drop past #4...
I think Michigan would move to #3. Bama would fall to #6, maybe as far as #7.
Posted on 8/27/12 at 11:02 pm to FightinTiga
quote:Oh, you beat me to it, but I was going to say around 18-20. How can anything higher be justified?
Michigan shouldn't be in the top 20,what a frickin' joke.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News