Started By
Message
Does losing Da'Rick Rogers make Tennessee better or worse?
Posted on 8/24/12 at 8:34 am
Posted on 8/24/12 at 8:34 am
The obvious answer is that they will be worse but I've seen many teams in the past teams be better off with players that are cancerous. I think with him being gone it will help us come together as a team and it also says noone is safe from being booted off the team. We also have two of the most talented receivers in the league with CP and Justin Hunter playing wideout so its not like we dont have a wideout to throw too.
17
Posted on 8/24/12 at 8:34 am to tennfanatic
TN FUUUUCKED
Posted on 8/24/12 at 8:34 am to tennfanatic
worse, obviously.
I don't think it really changes our outlook though. 7,8,9 wins. that's the range. 8 being most likely.
I don't think it really changes our outlook though. 7,8,9 wins. that's the range. 8 being most likely.
This post was edited on 8/24/12 at 8:36 am
Posted on 8/24/12 at 8:36 am to tennfanatic
How many INTs did we lose when we booted Janoris?
It made us worse on D but he had to go. I see a similar situation for UT.
Once upon a time we heard that double teams didn't matter anymore because of 3 all world WRs. Now we add in Zach.
It made us worse on D but he had to go. I see a similar situation for UT.
Once upon a time we heard that double teams didn't matter anymore because of 3 all world WRs. Now we add in Zach.
Posted on 8/24/12 at 8:37 am to tennfanatic
If one of the other 2 WR's go down, you're instantly in trouble
If that happened with Rogers on the team, it wouldn't make that big of a difference.
THAT'S where you guys are screwed
If that happened with Rogers on the team, it wouldn't make that big of a difference.
THAT'S where you guys are screwed
Posted on 8/24/12 at 8:37 am to tennfanatic
Posted on 8/24/12 at 8:37 am to tennfanatic
Doesn't make things easier for De'Rek Dooley.
Posted on 8/24/12 at 8:37 am to tennfanatic
Posted on 8/24/12 at 8:39 am to Tigerbait337
quote:
If one of the other 2 WR's go down, you're instantly in trouble
It sucks, and he was was easily one of our top three most talented players. But we'd been a lot worse off, if we'd lost Bray, or someone off the front 7.
It's not the end of the world, and I expect we'll still be more competitive than most on here anticipate.
Posted on 8/24/12 at 8:40 am to tennfanatic
quote:
TN FUUUUCKED
Posted on 8/24/12 at 8:42 am to tennfanatic
Nothing about this makes the team better....except, maybe the fact that we won't have to deal with his drama MIGHT make the team a little more focused...but that's about it.
Posted on 8/24/12 at 8:42 am to tennfanatic
Short term, worse. Rogers and Hunter (and I guess that other JC guy that is "supposed" to be all-world) on the field at the same time would have been a nightmare. Would have ended up in a lot of situations with a safety trying to cover one of them. The UT offense becomes much more managable now. Defenses will at least be able to put corners on UTs biggest WR threats 90% of the time.
Long term, maybe better. If this can send a message and help Dooley be viewed more seriously and in control by the players, other coaches, and fans.
Long term, maybe better. If this can send a message and help Dooley be viewed more seriously and in control by the players, other coaches, and fans.
This post was edited on 8/24/12 at 8:44 am
Posted on 8/24/12 at 8:44 am to roadGator
quote:
Now we add in Zach.
White boy Blanc about to rip defenses a new a-hole.
Posted on 8/24/12 at 8:45 am to tennfanatic
The guy will be back September 15th.
Book
That
shite
Sucka
Book
That
shite
Sucka
Posted on 8/24/12 at 8:46 am to elposter
quote:
Long term, maybe better. If this can send a message and help Dooley be viewed more seriously and in control by the players, other coaches, and fans
it was bold move by Dooley(though some reports say it came from above), this year will likely determine if he ever coaches high major football again.
Posted on 8/24/12 at 8:46 am to tennfanatic
worse. at but at least we have Hunter and CP.
it's very easy to figure out actually. if our rivals are very happy with what happened yesterday, it's bad for us.
it's very easy to figure out actually. if our rivals are very happy with what happened yesterday, it's bad for us.
Posted on 8/24/12 at 8:48 am to Crompdaddy8
frick long term this and long term that. last year, Dooley kicked out the best player on defense a week before kick off. and we all know how 2011 season turned out.
Posted on 8/24/12 at 8:49 am to Tennessee Jed
quote:
it was bold move by Dooley
No. He should have done it long ago IMO.
Look, DR is gone. If he had done it last year then the team could have moved on already and been fully adjusted.
By the way, can we let CP catch some passes before we crown him as great. No? OK.
Posted on 8/24/12 at 8:52 am to roadGator
quote:
No. He should have done it long ago IMO.
laughable, percy harvin.
This post was edited on 8/24/12 at 8:53 am
Posted on 8/24/12 at 8:53 am to tennfanatic
I opened this thread thinking of a witty reply to your silly question....but then I saw that you were serious.
Umm, I'm going to go out on a limb and say that losing one of your top WRs will make your offense worse, and by association, make your team worse
Umm, I'm going to go out on a limb and say that losing one of your top WRs will make your offense worse, and by association, make your team worse
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News