Started By
Message
To prevent this rematch mess in the future...
Posted on 11/22/11 at 10:33 pm
Posted on 11/22/11 at 10:33 pm
I think the sec should impose a rule that if two teams are in the top 2 of the bcs going into the conference championship week, those two team play in the sec champ game regaurdless of division. This would IMO help protect the importance of conference championships and would make for a hell of a sec champ game this year. I know the sec wants both teams in the mnc, but I think having national championship conference rematches kill the improtance of the sec championship gm.
This post was edited on 11/22/11 at 10:48 pm
7
Posted on 11/22/11 at 10:34 pm to BulkLogan1
Posted on 11/22/11 at 10:35 pm to BulkLogan1
Disagree...what if a third team from the SEC (maybe even from the East) is at 3 or 4 in the BCS that same year? The SECCG could have been their chance to propel themselves higher, and at minimum, to compete for the conference crown.
Posted on 11/22/11 at 10:36 pm to northalabamacracker
The SEC should break away from the NCAA and create it's own College Football League
Oklahoma and Oklahoma Jr yall can come too
Oklahoma and Oklahoma Jr yall can come too
Posted on 11/22/11 at 10:36 pm to BulkLogan1
quote:
I think the sec should impose a rule that if two teams are in the top 2 of the bcs going into the conference championship week, those two team play in the sec champ game regaurdless of division. This would IMO help protect the importance of conference championships and would make for a hell of a sec champ game this year. I know the sec wants both teams in the mnc, but I think having national championship conference rematches kill the improtance of the sec championship.
Shoot something...preferably your left testicle
Posted on 11/22/11 at 10:36 pm to DvlsAdvocat
Common sense and logic have no place on this forum sir. GOOD DAY.
Posted on 11/22/11 at 10:38 pm to BulkLogan1
Why? I will again respond to you Conference championships in playoff formats only give a homefield advantage. Wildcard teams beat conference champions all the time and they could have lost more then once to the conference champion during the regular season.
Note to conference champ DON'T LOSE THE REMATCH!!!
Note to conference champ DON'T LOSE THE REMATCH!!!
Posted on 11/22/11 at 10:39 pm to BulkLogan1
So and Alabama/LSU rematch in the SECCG is OK but an Alabama/LSU rematch in the BCSCG isn't?
explain
explain
Posted on 11/22/11 at 10:41 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
Geez guys. Its just a random thought. Not like I am the commish. What wrong with the thought other than bama wouldn't walk into the mnc this season without playing lsu again?
Posted on 11/22/11 at 10:41 pm to Lombardi44
Honestly I don't give a frick anymore whatever gets us closer to a playoff system is fine by me. Sure we got screwed out of the chance to play for the BCSCG in 2007 but frick it
Posted on 11/22/11 at 10:41 pm to Lombardi44
quote:
So and Alabama/LSU rematch in the SECCG is OK but an Alabama/LSU rematch in the BCSCG isn't?
explain
Exactly it is contradicting since the East team won its conference. His argument has no credibility at all.
Posted on 11/22/11 at 10:43 pm to BulkLogan1
quote:
Geez guys. Its just a random thought. Not like I am the commish. What wrong with the thought other than bama wouldn't walk into the mnc this season without playing lsu again?
Don't start a thread open for response to your idea if it's going to hurt your feelings. Just saying.
Posted on 11/22/11 at 10:44 pm to BulkLogan1
quote:
So and Alabama/LSU rematch in the SECCG is OK but an Alabama/LSU rematch in the BCSCG isn't?
Maybe I'm not being clear. I don't have an issue with a rematch. I only have a problem with a 12-0 lsu team playing a meaningless sec champ game so they can play a conference rematch in the mnc. I would just rather keep the championship games meaningful
This post was edited on 11/22/11 at 10:47 pm
Posted on 11/22/11 at 10:47 pm to BulkLogan1
quote:
I only have a problem with a 12-0 lsu team playing a meaningless sec champ game
It isn't meaningless at all because winning they are guaranteed a spot in the NC, if they lose they just may be playing in a BCS bowl.
Bama must overcome voter bias, and must win big as they don't control their destiny. LSU has earned the right to control what happens from here on out if they just keep winning.
This post was edited on 11/22/11 at 10:54 pm
Posted on 11/22/11 at 10:50 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
quote:
It isn't meaningless at all because winning they are guaranteed a spot in the NC, if they lose they just may be playing in a BCS bowl.
I don't feel like explaining things to you. It's not gonna sink in.
Posted on 11/22/11 at 10:51 pm to BulkLogan1
quote:
I don't feel like explaining things to you. It's not gonna sink in.
Funny I was thinking the same thing of you as I was responding to your last nonsense of a post.
Posted on 11/22/11 at 10:52 pm to BulkLogan1
quote:
Maybe I'm not being clear. I don't have an issue with a rematch. I only have a problem with a 12-0 lsu team playing a meaningless sec champ game
Motherofgod...
And I bet you would call Bama fans entitled and spoiled...
Posted on 11/22/11 at 11:03 pm to dawgfan24348
quote:
whatever gets us closer to a playoff system is fine by me
you know what would probably happen in a playoff
MOAR SEC rematches
Posted on 11/22/11 at 11:16 pm to BulkLogan1
quote:
I think the sec should impose a rule that if two teams are in the top 2 of the bcs going into the conference championship week, those two team play in the sec champ game regaurdless of division. This would IMO help protect the importance of conference championships and would make for a hell of a sec champ game this year. I know the sec wants both teams in the mnc, but I think having national championship conference rematches kill the improtance of the sec championship gm.
money talks. BCS will pay the conference double the money if 2 teams from SEC are in it
Posted on 11/22/11 at 11:17 pm to BulkLogan1
quote:
I think the sec should impose a rule that if two teams are in the top 2 of the bcs going into the conference championship week, those two team play in the sec champ game regaurdless of division. This would IMO help protect the importance of conference championships and would make for a hell of a sec champ game this year. I know the sec wants both teams in the mnc, but I think having national championship conference rematches kill the improtance of the sec championship gm.
No.
LSU shouldn't have to beat Alabama twice to win the SEC championship.
And plus, if Alabama beat LSU in Atlanta, everyone would want a rubber match in New Orleans still.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News