Started By
Message
Does anyone else think the field goals look good on the TV?
Posted on 11/27/10 at 12:51 am
Posted on 11/27/10 at 12:51 am
It's hard to tell that they missed those two with the short goal posts and all.
3
Posted on 11/27/10 at 12:52 am to trakmak777
I thought the 2nd one was good.
Posted on 11/27/10 at 12:53 am to Marines4Auburn
They're are probably being torn down tonight anyway.
Posted on 11/27/10 at 12:54 am to trakmak777
I thought the one to end regulation looked good, but the OT was a pull.
Posted on 11/27/10 at 12:55 am to trakmak777
That's why the refs sit right below each of the posts. CAn't really tell from TV angles when it's that close.
Posted on 11/27/10 at 12:58 am to TigerRanter
Yeah the regulation one looked good to me. The OT one looked wide.
Posted on 11/27/10 at 12:58 am to Puffoluffagus
I thought the first one was. Second one was a miss I think. 
Posted on 11/27/10 at 12:59 am to Puffoluffagus
Yall need to adjust your tvs or eyes
Posted on 11/27/10 at 1:14 am to Datbayoubengal
IT'S A DAMN CONSPIRACY!!!! 
Posted on 11/27/10 at 1:20 am to TigersBucs
If the FGs were borderline and even close to being good, the WAC refs would have ruled it good. Think about how much money their conference just lost by Boise State not making a BCS game. It would have made no sense to rule favorably towards Nevada.
Posted on 11/27/10 at 1:21 am to trakmak777
No.
frick Boise.
frick Boise.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News