Can someone explain this to me so i can understand it better?

Could someone please explain to me why someone makes a new thread every 6 hours or so asking this same question?

quote:

---

Some of us have a life and dont spend every min of every day on the computer a-hole!




Yeah and some of us have mastered such esoteric arts such as "going to the second page", "reading other people's threads that could pertain to my interests, or the ever so difficult,"search function"
Douche.

---

I always find it interesting when adults talk to each other like the 8th grade group of boys I was around yesterday.

The NC2A's on guidelines prohibit them from handing down eligibility mandates until an investigation is officially completed. They can sit down with an institution and advise(which is rumored to be what happened at Auburn last week)but can not force a program to sit anyone until their findings are presented. Most institutions(see UNC this year) sit players on their on volition when a players eligibility is in question. Auburn is choosing not to do this which, contrary to some opinions, does not mean they think they are in the clear. The FBI investigation is linked to the Newton case by virtue of Auburn alums being investigated for extortion and bribery in totally unrelated events. There's no flames visible but the smoke is getting thicker and thicker.

First of all, if you believe that Lowder et al is truly running the show at Auburn and all athletic/football admins are just puppets, then that gives you part of your answer.

The other part is that notwithstanding the relevant SEC rules, which are a bit more explicit, the NCAA rules on the subject leave a bit more to interpretation. And the question is whether Auburn has been shown enough evidence by the NCAA at this point to lead them to believe that Cam is actually ineligible right now.

My guess is that Auburn admins, while knowing that eventually there may be enough evidence to render Cam ineligible and/or screw Auburn big time, are still clinging to the idea that right now, there is no explicit evidence that Cam knew of the PFP plan, so the interpretation of the NCAA rule may well lead one to reasonably expect that the NCAA may not actually render Cam ineligible, at least based on the currently known evidence. That's all I can think of..