Started By
Message

re: Spring Football

Posted on 4/6/14 at 12:47 pm to
Posted by Wanderin Reb
Gallifrey
Member since Jun 2013
10738 posts
Posted on 4/6/14 at 12:47 pm to
I really wish he had taken one last year.

Him and Kailo both.
Posted by Doresrules
Dallas, Tx
Member since Dec 2012
4450 posts
Posted on 4/6/14 at 1:34 pm to
I like Wilkins the most. He seems like the first all around RB we have had since Brandon Bolden.
Posted by hehatedrew
New Zealand
Member since Oct 2009
25504 posts
Posted on 4/6/14 at 2:01 pm to
Any sort of injury report? Did we have any?
Posted by Dixie.Reb
Oxford
Member since Jul 2013
2378 posts
Posted on 4/6/14 at 2:04 pm to
Kailo was down for a second, but it didn't look serious. Freeze said that Laremy tweaked an ankle
Posted by Wanderin Reb
Gallifrey
Member since Jun 2013
10738 posts
Posted on 4/6/14 at 2:13 pm to
I like Wilkins. I'm glad he took a RS and I m glad he's got time to develop. By his Junior year him and Brazley will be a nice one-two punch, I think.
Posted by King of the North
Member since Aug 2013
771 posts
Posted on 4/6/14 at 3:18 pm to
I was in Auburn and couldn't make the game could someone give me a rundown on how we looked?
Posted by Wanderin Reb
Gallifrey
Member since Jun 2013
10738 posts
Posted on 4/6/14 at 3:49 pm to
You can watch a replay on ESPN3. It's worth a look.

It's hard to judge a spring game, but the team looked crisp and hungry. No one was " going through the motions". When 1st string defense and offense met, it could have gone either way. I think that's what you want.

Quarterback:
Bo is the clear starter, but people who crowned Kincade as the automatic back-up definitely jumped the gun. Ryan is the most natural looking QB we have. He never gets hurried in the pocket. Kincade looks good, too, but this is a tight race. Does also has a bright future at QB. Liggins needs to accept a position change, IMO.

Running Back -
We stacked. SEC fricked. Mathers has hit another gear. He broke one off for 96 yards yesterday. The only reason it didn't go for a TD was that Kailo ran him down at the 3 yard line. He fast. Walton didn't play due to a hammy. Dodson looks good and so do Wilkins and Brazley. Wish Dodson would take a RS, though.

WR -
We're thin, but talented. Obvious standouts are Quon and Quincy, but Collins Moore and Cody Core really looked good yesterday. Vince was out with some sort of injury.

OLine -
Same as WR, talented but thin. They looked much better than I had anticipated, though. If they can stay healthy we will be damn good here. Ben Still looks to be our guy at Center, which I'm ok with because we need Conyers at tackle.

Tight End -
Engram is back and looks as good as ever. Channing Ward looks good and I think this is a great move for him. He needs polishing in the passing game, but he has picked up blocking very well.

DLine -
Veterans are all great. As for newcomers, Haynes looks really good. Huge upside there.

Linebackers -
DT is going to be a good replacement for Marry. Very solid . Russell is fast, but lost. He'll get better. Strong made a few good plays, but he was against the 3s.

Corners -
I can't believe it, but this is the position I'm most excited about. Quez and Hilton look great and both some fun plays. Jones hung with Quon on a couple plays. Kailo has a good upside for his speed alone. We're in a great position here.

Safety -
Stacked. Cody is Cody. Trae looks improved. Alford is solid. Hampton looked very impressive for a true freshmen. He got I position for a nice INT that he dropped. Conner had a very nice PBU over Quincy at one point.


All in all, I don't want to get my hopes high based on a spring game, but knowing that we have more help coming to the OLine this summer (Cooper, Morris, Taylor) has me cautiously optimistic.
This post was edited on 4/6/14 at 4:11 pm
Posted by Rube Saibot
Member since Mar 2014
609 posts
Posted on 4/6/14 at 3:57 pm to
The only listing I'm seeing on espn3 is last year's game.
Posted by Wanderin Reb
Gallifrey
Member since Jun 2013
10738 posts
Posted on 4/6/14 at 4:00 pm to
I just watched it last night.

Just checked again. It's there under "Replays". At the very top for me.
Posted by hehatedrew
New Zealand
Member since Oct 2009
25504 posts
Posted on 4/6/14 at 4:00 pm to
I'm sorry, but if you have been following OM for longer than two years, you would know that we are actually pretty deep at WR for our standards. We typically have 1, maybe 2 serviceable guys. We have more than our fair share now, and have Pack available if we choose not to RS. Other than that, I think you pretty much nailed it. If Eli had this WR corp, I don't even...
Posted by King of the North
Member since Aug 2013
771 posts
Posted on 4/6/14 at 4:03 pm to
nice, appreciate it man
Posted by Wanderin Reb
Gallifrey
Member since Jun 2013
10738 posts
Posted on 4/6/14 at 4:09 pm to
Well you should tell the coaches how stacked we are at WR because they, too, think we're thin.

It might be better than years past, but it's still comparatively thin. An injury to Quon or Quincy would leave us pretty well screwed.

Freeze likes to play 4 and 5 wide a lot.

Quon
Quincy
Sanders

Those are our proven starters. After that we have Collins Moore, Core...aaaaaand? Yes, Pack will be here in the fall, but he's a true freshman. We can't expect all our freshmen to be Quon or even Quincy.

Despite what we've had in the past , we're still thin at WR right now and for what Freeze wants to run.
Posted by hehatedrew
New Zealand
Member since Oct 2009
25504 posts
Posted on 4/6/14 at 4:13 pm to
Ok, and what do you think Ingram is? Or epps if we don't RS him? They are WR playing TE. And I play golf regularly with someone who is a coach high up in our offense, as in the guy below the head coach , and he doesn't complain at all about our wr depth. Don't take "coach talk" so seriously, and don't tell people who actually know the coaches to tell the coaches things that they aren't really worried about...


OL is our worry. Injuries can happen at any position to any team and change everything...



Again, I thought most of your post was spot on, and you are correct if you want to play "what ifs" on WR, but may as well do that for every position if you are going that route and just give our entire year a "what if so and so gets injured"...
This post was edited on 4/6/14 at 4:20 pm
Posted by UMRealist
Member since Feb 2013
35360 posts
Posted on 4/6/14 at 4:21 pm to
Don't forget Engram plays out wide most of the time and so will Sammie Epps and Dayall Harris. I think we are fine at WR.

Posted by Wanderin Reb
Gallifrey
Member since Jun 2013
10738 posts
Posted on 4/6/14 at 4:23 pm to
quote:

Ok, and what do you think Ingram is? Or epps if we don't RS him? They are WR playing TE. And I play golf regularly with someone who is a coach high up in our offense, as in the guy below the head coach , and he doesn't complain at all about our wr depth. Don't take "coach talk" so seriously, and don't tell people who actually know the coaches to tell the coaches things that they aren't really worried about...


Don't get your feelings hurt, bud. I don't know you. How am I supposed to know you've got "connections"?

I'm going off what the coaches have said and by comparing our depth at WR to the rest of the team.

We were deep enough and solid enough to field two solid teams at every position but OL and WR. To me, that means we lack depth.

ETA - And all I meant was that we were comparatively thin at WR. I don't think it will be an issue, but it's definitely a position prone to injury that we absolutely cannot afford any at. We have a solid first string, but not much behind them. That is "thin" to me.
This post was edited on 4/6/14 at 4:27 pm
Posted by UMRealist
Member since Feb 2013
35360 posts
Posted on 4/6/14 at 4:32 pm to
The only two positions that worry me in regards to injury are QB and LT
Posted by Wanderin Reb
Gallifrey
Member since Jun 2013
10738 posts
Posted on 4/6/14 at 4:36 pm to
quote:

The only two positions that worry me in regards to injury are QB and LT


Well those are the obvious ones.

Once again, I think y'all are misinterpreting what I meant by "thin". I've explained that not having a solid 2nd string is what led me to call WR thin.

QB and OL are obviously much bigger positions of worry.
Posted by No Colors
Sandbar
Member since Sep 2010
10349 posts
Posted on 4/6/14 at 6:59 pm to
quote:

Him and Kailo both.

I was adament that Kailo needed a RS. I never thought he would work out at RB and figured last year would be a total waste from the standpoint of his development. If we have the CB depth (oxymoron I know) I would like to see him RS this year while he learns the position.
Posted by Whereisomaha
Member since Feb 2010
17939 posts
Posted on 4/6/14 at 7:03 pm to
Kailo's mind is on track. If he can go pro 3 years from now RS him will mean shite an I think everyone believes he's going pro in 3 years. Track of course
Posted by Wanderin Reb
Gallifrey
Member since Jun 2013
10738 posts
Posted on 4/6/14 at 7:05 pm to
Is he that fast? I don't know shite about track.
first pageprev pagePage 33 of 36Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter