Started By
Message
Was Deckard a replicant?
Posted on 3/10/16 at 12:30 am
Posted on 3/10/16 at 12:30 am
Yes or no answers only, please.
14
Posted on 3/10/16 at 7:07 am to The_Joker
Yes
Posted on 3/10/16 at 7:59 am to The_Joker
Depends on which cut you watch ... but when trying to stick to your limitations the only answer is yes.
Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep ... that's something else altogether.
Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep ... that's something else altogether.
Posted on 3/10/16 at 8:00 am to The_Joker
No
Posted on 3/10/16 at 8:45 am to GurleyGirl
Did he ever witness attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion? Has he watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser Gate? No?
Then no.
Then no.
Posted on 3/10/16 at 8:47 am to The_Joker
Maybe
Posted on 3/10/16 at 9:20 am to The_Joker
Yes.
Posted on 3/10/16 at 9:20 am to The_Joker
I think it is pretty clear if you were paying attention that he is in fact a replicant
Posted on 3/10/16 at 9:27 am to The_Joker
Yes, unfortunately. I like the original ending with him being a human better, but boring fans and Ridley Scott alike with their needs for twists and meta endings desired the replicant ending and Ridley Scott made that a reality with the unicorn dream thing.
But whatevz. Still a great movie.
But whatevz. Still a great movie.
Posted on 3/10/16 at 10:12 am to The_Joker
Yes.
Posted on 3/10/16 at 11:03 am to The_Joker
was Dickhard a wat?
Posted on 3/10/16 at 11:38 am to The_Joker
No.
He's human in the book and he's human in the original film. Even the director doesn't get to change it just because he changed his mind decades later.
Deckard's human and Han shot first. Deal with it.
He's human in the book and he's human in the original film. Even the director doesn't get to change it just because he changed his mind decades later.
Deckard's human and Han shot first. Deal with it.
Posted on 3/10/16 at 4:22 pm to The_Joker
yes
Posted on 3/10/16 at 9:45 pm to The_Joker
No.
Posted on 3/11/16 at 8:26 am to The_Joker
No. Ridley Scott's additions to the original film doesn't change that. Director cut = crap.
Posted on 3/11/16 at 8:28 am to Iron Lion
Either way, that movie was seriously boring af
Posted on 3/11/16 at 8:44 am to Gradual_Stroke
Amen. It and 2001 are just too slow for modern audiences.
Posted on 3/11/16 at 8:47 am to cardboardboxer
2001 was awesome
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News