Started By
Message

re: I have a question for the dads here.

Posted on 6/6/16 at 11:37 am to
Posted by 2smooth
Member since Jan 2015
2777 posts
Posted on 6/6/16 at 11:37 am to
My kids won't be watching R rated movies as long as I have a say in it.
Posted by AllDawg
Evans GA
Member since Jan 2014
1516 posts
Posted on 6/6/16 at 12:01 pm to
If you have to ask the question you already know the answer.
Posted by GnashRebel
Member since May 2015
8174 posts
Posted on 6/6/16 at 12:32 pm to
I wouldn't let them watch R rated movies.
Posted by fillmoregandt
OTM
Member since Nov 2009
14368 posts
Posted on 6/6/16 at 1:04 pm to
Has anyone gone with the "be their dad, not their friend" response yet?
Posted by dmjones
Acworth, GA
Member since Mar 2016
2303 posts
Posted on 6/6/16 at 1:35 pm to
My son is only 18 months old, so we're a long way from this, but I can't imagine taking him to watch an R rated movie at age 8. I guess it depends on why said movie is rated R.
Posted by GnashRebel
Member since May 2015
8174 posts
Posted on 6/6/16 at 1:45 pm to
Someone is downvoting the people who say no. I guess we know we have one kid under 18 on tRant today.
Posted by Kentucker
Cincinnati, KY
Member since Apr 2013
19351 posts
Posted on 6/6/16 at 5:10 pm to
quote:

Has anyone gone with the "be their dad, not their friend" response yet?


No one has and that's a great point. Too many parents try to be their kids' friend and wind up being loathed by them.

A parent who is an authority figure for their children is making their future lives easier. I don't know of a society that lacks any kind of authority that everyone must respect.
Posted by CowTownReb
Member since Jan 2013
353 posts
Posted on 6/6/16 at 6:52 pm to
quote:

My son is only 18 months old, so we're a long way from this, but I can't imagine taking him to watch an R rated movie at age 8. I guess it depends on why said movie is rated R.


And that really is what I was getting at.

The MPAA is so arbitrary in its rating system. There is almost no consistency. I mean, Poltergeist had a guy ripping his face off and it was still rated PG-13.

Meanwhile, The King's Speech was rated R because of "some" language. Well, Catch Me If You Can had an f-bomb in it, and was still rated PG-13. The whole thing makes no sense.

I can find no consistent criteria in how films are rated, which is why I watch them first.
Posted by Iron Lion
North of the river
Member since Nov 2014
11801 posts
Posted on 6/7/16 at 6:35 am to
I have 2 boys and I've never sheltered them. They are 21 and 14 now but when they were younger I let them watch scary movies and violent movies. They seem to have turned out ok.
Posted by Pvt Hudson
Member since Jan 2013
3537 posts
Posted on 6/7/16 at 9:02 am to
I agree with CowTown. You need to know your kids and know the movie. No way I'm letting my kids watch Wolf of Wall Street, but I have been watching Blues Brothers with my daughter since she was 12. She knows better than to repeat the filthy language, but other than a few f-bombs, it is a pretty clean movie.
Posted by partsman103
Member since Sep 2008
8089 posts
Posted on 6/7/16 at 10:00 am to
Imo depends on the maturity level of each kid.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter