Started By
Message
re: Cuba/Castro: No one saw this coming, right?
Posted on 1/29/15 at 7:10 pm to kywildcatfanone
Posted on 1/29/15 at 7:10 pm to kywildcatfanone
quote:
He will if he can. Anything to harm America.
It certainly does appear that way at times ... most of the time actually.
He's been very destructive - to the point where I'm not sure we'll ever recover.
He said he was going to fundamentally change this country, and he probably has ... for the worse.
You can bet Castro is not saying this without some sort of indication that he's received from our sorry-assed State Department that he will be given many concessions.
Posted on 1/29/15 at 9:25 pm to scrooster
My dad saw Gloria Estefan at Gitmo in 1995.
He's got some good Cuban prisoner stories
He's got some good Cuban prisoner stories
This post was edited on 1/29/15 at 9:26 pm
Posted on 1/30/15 at 9:04 am to scrooster
The lease was a part of the 1903 Cuban-American Treaty. One only need to read the terms of the 1901 Platt Amendment to understand that the Cuban signatures were the product of duress.
Even if one were to take the position that it wasn't signed under duress, the terms of the lease require the land to be used only as a naval or coaling station. That it is being used as a prison to indefinitely detain declared enemies of the United States exceeds the scope of the lease.
Lastly, how would we feel if the Chinese operated a military installation in a large swath of land in Oregon where they housed their political enemies without trial and for an indefinite time period? Yet the Cubans are supposed to be ok with us being there? Cognitive dissonance at its finest.
Even if one were to take the position that it wasn't signed under duress, the terms of the lease require the land to be used only as a naval or coaling station. That it is being used as a prison to indefinitely detain declared enemies of the United States exceeds the scope of the lease.
Lastly, how would we feel if the Chinese operated a military installation in a large swath of land in Oregon where they housed their political enemies without trial and for an indefinite time period? Yet the Cubans are supposed to be ok with us being there? Cognitive dissonance at its finest.
Posted on 1/30/15 at 9:25 am to JoeMoTiger
quote:
This is what happens when a woman gives birth to a fatherless child, and then as a young boy is schooled in a madrasa, and later immigrates to America and is mentored by Saul Alinsky, Frank Marshall Davis, Rev Wright and the like, becomes a pseudo constitutional lawyer, later a community rabble rouser/organizer, runs for public office and is elected Senator of Illinois, and thanks to low info voters is elected twice to the highest office in the US.
I hate it when that happens to kids. It is a mess.
Posted on 1/30/15 at 9:39 am to SCLibertarian
quote:
Even if one were to take the position that it wasn't signed under duress, the terms of the lease require the land to be used only as a naval or coaling station. That it is being used as a prison to indefinitely detain declared enemies of the United States exceeds the scope of the lease.
Technically, as it is a military/Navy run prison, the case can be made that it is still within the scope of the lease. Every military base must have a detainment facility.
quote:
Lastly, how would we feel if the Chinese operated a military installation in a large swath of land in Oregon where they housed their political enemies without trial and for an indefinite time period? Yet the Cubans are supposed to be ok with us being there? Cognitive dissonance at its finest.
Ignoring the fact that we had just fought a war granting Cuba their independence from Spain, and instead of annexing Cuba (A major political opinion at the time, one I'd have supported) and making it a state, we granted them independence. They didn't earn it, we gave it. All we asked for was the rights to a Naval base in an unpopulated area. That's pretty benevolent. How quick the Cuban people are to forget the American blood spilled for their freedom. Take note BlackPawnMartyr.
That's a great analogy to see the Cuban side in the modern lens, but it's irrelevant to the issue. International politics has never, and will never be about fairness. We piss people off all the time around the world because it benefits us to do so. The British were impressing our sailors in 1812 until we did something about it. If Cuba was powerful enough, rest assured they'd be making a case for cassus belli [sp] to annex Miami and the Keys.
Posted on 1/30/15 at 9:55 am to cokebottleag
The Spanish–American War (Spanish: Guerra hispano-estadounidense) was a conflict in 1898 between Spain and the United States, the result of American intervention in the Cuban War of Independence. American attacks on Spain's Pacific possessions led to involvement in the Philippine Revolution and ultimately to the Philippine–American War.[9]
Revolts against Spanish rule had occurred for some years in Cuba. There had been war scares before, as in the Virginius Affair in 1873. In the late 1890s, American public opinion was agitated by anti-Spanish propaganda led by journalists such as Joseph Pulitzer and William Hearst which used yellow journalism to criticize Spanish administration of Cuba. After the mysterious sinking of the American battleship Maine in Havana harbor, political pressures from the Democratic Party and certain industrialists pushed the administration of Republican President William McKinley into a war he had wished to avoid.[10] Compromise was sought by Spain, but rejected by the United States which sent an ultimatum to Spain demanding it surrender control of Cuba. First Madrid, then Washington, formally declared war.[11]
Although the main issue was Cuban independence, the ten-week war was fought in both the Caribbean and the Pacific. American naval power proved decisive, allowing U.S. expeditionary forces to disembark in Cuba against a Spanish garrison already brought to its knees by nationwide Cuban insurgent attacks and further wasted by yellow fever.[12] Numerically superior Cuban, Philippine, and American forces obtained the surrender of Santiago de Cuba and Manila despite the good performance of some Spanish infantry units and fierce fighting for positions such as San Juan Hill.[13] With two obsolete Spanish squadrons sunk in Santiago de Cuba and Manila Bay and a third, more modern fleet recalled home to protect the Spanish coasts, Madrid sued for peace.[14]
LINK
Revolts against Spanish rule had occurred for some years in Cuba. There had been war scares before, as in the Virginius Affair in 1873. In the late 1890s, American public opinion was agitated by anti-Spanish propaganda led by journalists such as Joseph Pulitzer and William Hearst which used yellow journalism to criticize Spanish administration of Cuba. After the mysterious sinking of the American battleship Maine in Havana harbor, political pressures from the Democratic Party and certain industrialists pushed the administration of Republican President William McKinley into a war he had wished to avoid.[10] Compromise was sought by Spain, but rejected by the United States which sent an ultimatum to Spain demanding it surrender control of Cuba. First Madrid, then Washington, formally declared war.[11]
Although the main issue was Cuban independence, the ten-week war was fought in both the Caribbean and the Pacific. American naval power proved decisive, allowing U.S. expeditionary forces to disembark in Cuba against a Spanish garrison already brought to its knees by nationwide Cuban insurgent attacks and further wasted by yellow fever.[12] Numerically superior Cuban, Philippine, and American forces obtained the surrender of Santiago de Cuba and Manila despite the good performance of some Spanish infantry units and fierce fighting for positions such as San Juan Hill.[13] With two obsolete Spanish squadrons sunk in Santiago de Cuba and Manila Bay and a third, more modern fleet recalled home to protect the Spanish coasts, Madrid sued for peace.[14]
LINK
Posted on 1/30/15 at 9:59 am to Person of interest
Anyone can make a quote or provide a reference what do you think, or what are you trying to say?
Posted on 1/30/15 at 10:04 am to Person of interest
funny how policy was manipulated by weaponry.
Guam and the other spoils in the Pacific were kept primarily as coal fueling stations for our battleships. If Cuba were further away we would have kept it.
Ah, if it were a state, the diving I could do in those waters.
Guam and the other spoils in the Pacific were kept primarily as coal fueling stations for our battleships. If Cuba were further away we would have kept it.
Ah, if it were a state, the diving I could do in those waters.
Posted on 1/30/15 at 10:06 am to DawgSmoke
I think he's trying to say the Cubans were getting themselves independence anyway.
Without American Naval Power, the Cubans could have been dead in the water, or had a much longer and bloodier time getting their Nationhood.
A better analogy than the China one, would have been if France had made a condition of helping the 13 colonies that they be allowed a small coaling station in an unpopulated area of Maine. We would have said yes in a heartbeat.
Without American Naval Power, the Cubans could have been dead in the water, or had a much longer and bloodier time getting their Nationhood.
A better analogy than the China one, would have been if France had made a condition of helping the 13 colonies that they be allowed a small coaling station in an unpopulated area of Maine. We would have said yes in a heartbeat.
This post was edited on 1/30/15 at 10:08 am
Posted on 1/30/15 at 10:08 am to hogminer
What did you expect Castro to say? "Hey I'm about to get bent over by the U.S., so instead of complaining I'm just going to shut-up and take it."
Posted on 1/30/15 at 10:17 am to DawgSmoke
Just putting a few facts out there before the spin machine hit high. We didn't go to war because of some benevolent love for Cubans freedom. We went in to take colonial possessions from Spain in the Caribbean and Pacific.
banana republics
banana republics
This post was edited on 1/30/15 at 10:23 am
Posted on 1/30/15 at 10:26 am to Person of interest
Hey I had world history in high school, in fact I still have a thousand dollar set of encyclopedias from 1981 in the garage my folks bought for me...
So, if I want a blind, bland page of history I have that, in a hard copy....
Other than this I can't wait for Cuba to open up a 1000+ new millionaires will be made in 5 years. IMO
So, if I want a blind, bland page of history I have that, in a hard copy....
Other than this I can't wait for Cuba to open up a 1000+ new millionaires will be made in 5 years. IMO
Posted on 1/30/15 at 10:29 am to DawgSmoke
I'd be lying if I said I wouldn't be interested in transporting some of those 50s cars back for my consumption.
Posted on 1/30/15 at 10:29 am to DawgSmoke
Here is a Smedley Butler (most decorated Marine ever at the time of his death) quote about that time.
I spent 33 years and four months in active military service and during that period I spent most of my time as a high class muscle man for Big Business, for Wall Street and the bankers. In short, I was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism. I helped make Mexico and especially Tampico safe for American oil interests in 1914. I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank boys to collect revenues in. I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefit of Wall Street. I helped purify Nicaragua for the International Banking House of Brown Brothers in 1902–1912. I brought light to the Dominican Republic for the American sugar interests in 1916. I helped make Honduras right for the American fruit companies in 1903. In China in 1927 I helped see to it that Standard Oil went on its way unmolested. Looking back on it, I might have given Al Capone a few hints. The best he could do was to operate his racket in three districts. I operated on three continents.
LINK
I spent 33 years and four months in active military service and during that period I spent most of my time as a high class muscle man for Big Business, for Wall Street and the bankers. In short, I was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism. I helped make Mexico and especially Tampico safe for American oil interests in 1914. I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank boys to collect revenues in. I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefit of Wall Street. I helped purify Nicaragua for the International Banking House of Brown Brothers in 1902–1912. I brought light to the Dominican Republic for the American sugar interests in 1916. I helped make Honduras right for the American fruit companies in 1903. In China in 1927 I helped see to it that Standard Oil went on its way unmolested. Looking back on it, I might have given Al Capone a few hints. The best he could do was to operate his racket in three districts. I operated on three continents.
LINK
Posted on 1/30/15 at 10:47 am to Person of interest
Okay, did I mention I spent 4+ years in the Marines. I actually served in Smedley Butler on Okinawa in 1985.
Posted on 1/30/15 at 10:56 am to DawgSmoke
Two of my brothers spent quite a bit a time there in the early and mid 80's.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News