Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Bojangles > Popeyes

Posted on 4/22/15 at 3:58 pm
Posted by CockInYourEar
Charlotte
Member since Sep 2012
22458 posts
Posted on 4/22/15 at 3:58 pm
https://www.kgw.com/story/news/nation/2015/04/22/pregnant-woman-robbery/26173521/

quote:

CHANNELVIEW, Texas — After a fast-food restaurant was robbed, the pregnant shift manager said she was fired for refusing to reimburse the company the money that was stolen.

The heist happened March 31 at a Popeyes (PLKI) fried-chicken restaurant here and was captured on surveillance video. The Harris County Sheriff's Office still has not identified the gunman more than three weeks after the crime.

"I told them I'm not paying nothing," Marissa Holcomb said. "I just had a gun to me. I'm not paying the money."


quote:

"By the back of my shirt, he pulled me up and he pushed me to the front," she said. "He told me to give him everything out of my safe."

But the only thing Holcomb could open were the registers. The gunman got away with nearly $400.
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
37655 posts
Posted on 4/22/15 at 4:09 pm to
Hey ... she failed to follow the rules, multiple times. She violated corporate policy, multiple times.

I feel sorry for her but perhaps, if she ever lands another restaurant job where her employers trust her with the till ... perhaps she'll follow the rules next time.
Posted by Duke
Twin Lakes, CO
Member since Jan 2008
35623 posts
Posted on 4/22/15 at 4:13 pm to
quote:


Hey ... she failed to follow the rules, multiple times. She violated corporate policy, multiple times.


Those are awful policies that put employees in danger. I've had my share of retail and fast food type jobs, and I was always instructed to give the robber the money. Having an employee killed because you don't want to lose the money in your tills is terrible PR.
Posted by Pavoloco83
Acworth Ga. too many damn dawgs
Member since Nov 2013
15347 posts
Posted on 4/22/15 at 4:32 pm to
quote:

Having an employee killed because you don't want to lose the money in your tills is terrible PR.


More to the point, the restaurant will never contain as much money as what they would get sued for for endangering an employee and wrongful death or negligence. That payout would be 7 figures.
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
37655 posts
Posted on 4/22/15 at 4:32 pm to
quote:

Those are awful policies that put employees in danger. I've had my share of retail and fast food type jobs, and I was always instructed to give the robber the money. Having an employee killed because you don't want to lose the money in your tills is terrible PR.


Listen ... on this one I am uniquely qualified on this board to comment. Some here know I made money in the restaurant business, not the least of which were a few Bojangles from SC to TX.

You have your cashiers dump their drawers regularly, especially of their $50 and $20, to prevent such things from happening.

Robbers park outside and count customers and count minutes between drops. They know when to hit your cashiers that way.

If we caught our cashiers not dropping their cash regularly, and not necessarily routinely but regularly ... we would either move them off the cash register or let them go.

This girl, as precious as she is and as pregnant as she is ... she had to go. She had been warned several times.
Posted by JordonfortheJ
Bavaria-Germany
Member since Mar 2012
14547 posts
Posted on 4/22/15 at 4:34 pm to
quote:

Those are awful policies that put employees in danger. I've had my share of retail and fast food type jobs, and I was always instructed to give the robber the money. Having an employee killed because you don't want to lose the money in your tills is terrible PR.


What? not sure if you understand.

When I worked at retail the most we could have in our drawer was $200 and we put $100 in the safe to put the drawer back at $100.
They didn't tell her not to give the robber money but if she followed the rules he wouldn't have gotten as much as he did because it would have been in the safe that she couldn't open.
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
37655 posts
Posted on 4/22/15 at 4:38 pm to
quote:

More to the point, the restaurant will never contain as much money as what they would get sued for for endangering an employee and wrongful death or negligence. That payout would be 7 figures.


Policy, and this has already been tested in the court system ... is that the less money you allow to accumulate in that drawer, the safer you are.

The issue here is not the fact that she gave the robber the money. Of course, we always instructed our people to never, not ever, try to be a hero. No amount of money is worth losing one of our employees. But you had to follow the rules. You had to drop the big bills frequently ... and most of our cashiers would take a moment and drop them in the safe as soon as they took them in.

That's the rules. They work. Every fast food franchise knows about'em.

I hate it for the little girl ... I hope she learns her lesson. It could have been much worse.
Posted by Duke
Twin Lakes, CO
Member since Jan 2008
35623 posts
Posted on 4/22/15 at 4:41 pm to
As I read the blurb and not the article, I didn't realize she wasn't dropping her big bills. That's on her if that's the case. We dropped all 20s and didn't accept anything bigger at one place I worked for that reason.
Posted by JordonfortheJ
Bavaria-Germany
Member since Mar 2012
14547 posts
Posted on 4/22/15 at 4:44 pm to
quote:

No amount of money is worth losing one of our employees


especially money that is not directly yours.
Posted by I Ham That I Ham
Oh Lord, it's hard to be humble
Member since Jan 2012
10773 posts
Posted on 4/22/15 at 8:21 pm to
Bojangles is nasty
Posted by CockInYourEar
Charlotte
Member since Sep 2012
22458 posts
Posted on 4/22/15 at 9:38 pm to
quote:

Bojangles is nasty


Posted by TT9
Global warming
Member since Sep 2008
82952 posts
Posted on 4/22/15 at 10:00 pm to
I'm a vegan, we talking chicken here? Because here in east Tennessee there's far more Bojangles than Popeyes.
Posted by Stacked
Member since Apr 2012
5675 posts
Posted on 4/22/15 at 10:06 pm to
For the record, and I can't believe no one's said this yet, there's no way Popeyes is inferior to bojangels.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111524 posts
Posted on 4/22/15 at 10:17 pm to
Is $400 that much to have in a register?

You'd have to start with $200 or so in the register to start a shift. I'd guess $200 in sales is less than 30 minutes of sales during a rush.
Posted by td01241
Savannah
Member since Nov 2012
22848 posts
Posted on 4/22/15 at 10:18 pm to
When I bartend I can have up to 1400-1500 dollars in my register at any time.
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
37655 posts
Posted on 4/22/15 at 10:38 pm to
Always depended on the store location.

You maintained a drawer based on location and shift. The bean counters made the determinations.

When I sold out to my cousin in Texas all but two of our stores were considered boutique stores .... meaning upper middle class districts where, at the time, debit and credit cards were far more prevelent than cash.

The average drawer 1st shift drawer was primed at $80.00 in cash, mostly fives and ones, and $120.00 in change.

Cashiers were allowed to keep one twenty from the take in the drawer, but they had to dump any twenty and above in the slot and they had to dump ten $10s at a time even if it was every fifteen minutes on third shift .... basically after dark and until closing.

If, after dark, a manager did a spot audit on your drawer and they caught you with more than $100.00 cash (paper) in your drawer ... you would be pulled off the register.

$100 is a lot of paper change. Three $10s, ten $5s, twenty $1s.

Rolled quarters, dimes, nickles and pennies were available from the spit and managers could dial-up small bills in change if needed .... it rarely was.

Many stores used to do drawer exchanges during rush hours and we had a few stores with four registers although we only had all four going during lunch time in daylight hours or weekend nights after ballgames.

Most stores shut down to one register after dark otherwise .... and many Wendy's have even gone to single registers 90% of the time.

Popeyes tended to operate in lower end districts and they had a much higher rate of armed robbery than any other franchise I can think of because of their market.
Posted by InVolNerable
Member since Jan 2012
10203 posts
Posted on 4/23/15 at 7:33 am to
quote:

Those are awful policies that put employees in danger.
It's awful policy to limit the amount that stays in the cash register?

Nevermind. It's been discussed
This post was edited on 4/23/15 at 7:35 am
Posted by Hardy_Har
MS
Member since Nov 2012
16285 posts
Posted on 4/23/15 at 7:48 am to
quote:

Listen ... on this one I am uniquely qualified on this board to comment
Posted by CheeseburgerEddie
Crimson Tide Fan Club
Member since Oct 2012
15574 posts
Posted on 4/23/15 at 8:05 am to
I lol'd too
Posted by Duke
Twin Lakes, CO
Member since Jan 2008
35623 posts
Posted on 4/23/15 at 8:12 am to
quote:

Is $400 that much to have in a register?


It's not an unthinkable amount if they got popped with a rush. Most of my till experience was working at a Starbucks and it was rare to get that much in a till except on a weekend afternoon. People pay in cards and all $20s were dropped into a locked drop box. More often than dropping, I had to open the safe and add money to tills as a shift went on because of change on $20s. Baristas couldn't open tills, only a supervisor with keys.

All of this was in place to reduce the risk of robbery. I don't know Popeye's policies, but requiring drops is a common practice.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter