Started By
Message

re: Clemsons stupid rock

Posted on 6/29/13 at 10:46 am to
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
37613 posts
Posted on 6/29/13 at 10:46 am to
quote:

I always wondered what a tater looked like. Can't be unseen.


It's never pretty. Never. They are an obnoxious group.
Posted by CNB
Columbia, SC
Member since Sep 2007
95899 posts
Posted on 6/29/13 at 10:48 am to
quote:

This is getting flat out ridiculous. We are so much better than this. To post an 18 year old kid's facebook page, phone number, address, and threaten him and his loved ones in any way is flat out unacceptable. We currently have a poll on here asking if his girlfriend is going to break up with him which turned into a conversation of whether or not she will accept him after an adjustment to one of his digestive parts. His dad is a man of faith and just lost his church to a fire. I cannot comprehend how anyone could be so angry at a person that did not hurt them or their loved ones in any way.

I, like all Clemson fans was pretty upset by the news of "The Chip". The fact that our security system around Clemosn's most precious possession was made out of plastic was pretty infuriating. The witch hunt we directed towards UGA and SC fans made us look really bad. The point we are at now is just totally on another level.



TaterNet gettin pretty serious.

If you aren't registered, this site will look like shite
Posted by danfraz
San Antonio TX
Member since Apr 2008
24550 posts
Posted on 6/29/13 at 10:48 am to
South Carolina's stupid cock
Posted by Damn Good Dawg
Member since Feb 2011
47325 posts
Posted on 6/29/13 at 11:13 am to
Truth be told of some preppy fricker decided he was gonna trot his 90 lb happy arse on to our campus to vandalize something like that for his own keeping then I'd be cool with letting the kid burn for it, legally and by message board vigilantes. What a douche.
Posted by CNB
Columbia, SC
Member since Sep 2007
95899 posts
Posted on 6/29/13 at 11:26 am to
quote:

I would say he is getting lucky in the fact that they are undervaluing the rock. If you put it up for auction I'm betting it would bring more than 10g's.


Look how much they think this rock is worth
Posted by ConwayGamecock
South Carolina
Member since Jan 2012
9121 posts
Posted on 6/29/13 at 11:50 am to
quote:

Do you know anything about the rivalry? Clemson has historically dominated it.


Clemson dominated USC from 1896 to 1919, going 13-3-1 in that span. For a while both programs were mostly mediocre than great. Then in the 1970s Clemson took a step upward under Danny Ford similar to the step forward that we're now taking. From 1971 to today CU went 27-14-1, with most of the lop-sided period coming most recently, going 24-8-1 from 1976 up to our 4-game streak. Up to that 1976 season, Clemson held a series advantage of 41-29-1 over USC: a decisive lead but hardly "domination" over a 70-year span.


Those two periods combine for a 40-17-2 record over USC, and leaves a period in the middle of our rivalry where both teams went 25-24-2 in Clemson's favor from 1920 through 1970, covering most of the time both were conference foes in the Southern Conference and Atlanta Coast Conference.

The most recent period is the most galling for me as I have witnessed most if not all of it take place. Hopefully we are seeing a period where USC can experience a little bit of dominance itself for a while, and close the series record a bit more. But Clemson has only "dominated" the series over only half of it's span, technically speaking, with the other half being almost dead even...
This post was edited on 6/29/13 at 11:54 am
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter