Started By
Message
Beamer needs
Posted on 10/29/22 at 9:51 pm
Posted on 10/29/22 at 9:51 pm
To look for an oc..he's had 21 games to make a judgement.
Satt ain't it..
Satt ain't it..
2
Posted on 10/30/22 at 1:55 pm to bleedsgarnet
He should have not been retained after last year. We could fire him now and let Kitchens take over but it's my understanding that he will only be here this year and then out west in NFL. Shane hasn't called plays so who would take over?
Posted on 10/30/22 at 5:15 pm to bleedsgarnet
No, Satt ain't it.
But you have to hire someone who wants the job. This isn't an attractive position for anyone with an option.
Not fun to say, but it's true. It's a bad job. We're only more attractive than Vandy, and that's borderline.
But you have to hire someone who wants the job. This isn't an attractive position for anyone with an option.
Not fun to say, but it's true. It's a bad job. We're only more attractive than Vandy, and that's borderline.
Posted on 10/30/22 at 6:33 pm to RoyalAir
There is always a good Mind from the lower ranks that is ready to prove himself.
The list is forever Long of coaches who started at the bottom
The list is forever Long of coaches who started at the bottom
Posted on 10/30/22 at 6:50 pm to RoyalAir
quote:
But you have to hire someone who wants the job. This isn't an attractive position for anyone with an option.
coming into this year I think you would have said it was pretty attractive.
You had Bell and Stogner, with Lloyd. Wells, Vann, and two speedy guys in Legette/Brown.
Rattler hadnt decided and didnt decide until he talked to Satt , so that one is more up in the air...but I think he still may have come. Stog was a big part in getting him.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News