I've been thinking about the scenario. Is the point to get the best 4 teams in the playoff or is it to find the best team in college football?

If Georgia beats a #1 Mississippi State in the SEC championship, should both go to the playoffs? If the point is to find the best team, then why bring Mississippi State to the playoffs when they couldn't even win the conference? Is that a logical conclusion that the best team cannot be the second best in their conference?

Or should the playoffs just be the top 4 teams and let them duke it out in a brand new, 2 game season?

3 ...

Report Post

Posted by DawgPhoneGuy

Brandon MS

Member since Sep 2014

413 posts

Posted on 10/20/14 at 12:08 am to FourthQuarter

Your point has no merit. That is like saying the best JV team in the state Gould ply the best high school in the state because they both on in their perspective places.

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by vidtiger23

Member since Feb 2012

5238 posts

Posted on 10/20/14 at 12:10 am to FourthQuarter

quote:
Is that a logical conclusion that the best team cannot be the second best in their conference?

2011 doesn't come to mind? Hmm nice bait

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by BallstotheWesleyWall

Swagosphere

Member since Jan 2014

9364 posts

Posted on 10/20/14 at 12:10 am to DawgPhoneGuy

You drunk, Clark?

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by IAmReality

Member since Oct 2012

12229 posts

Posted on 10/20/14 at 12:31 am to FourthQuarter

The point of the playoff SHOULD be that the best 4 teams in college football are invited to prove they are THE best.

However the REAL point is of course like everything else in life: money, politics, etc.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by AggieHank86

Texas

Member since Sep 2013

42941 posts

Posted on 10/20/14 at 12:34 am to DawgPhoneGuy

quote:
Your point has no merit. That is like saying the best JV team in the state Gould ply the best high school in the state because they both on in their perspective places.

Your point is valid.

Your post is nearly unreadable.

Page 1