Started By
Message

State Paper article on Zion's recruitment

Posted on 9/21/17 at 9:38 am
Posted by GameCocky88
Mount Pleasant, SC
Member since Dec 2015
4837 posts
Posted on 9/21/17 at 9:38 am
The state listed 5 teams with the best chances of landing Zion. Us, Clemson, UCLA, UNC, Kansas and Kentucky were the teams. However, they went on to say that the 3 teams with the best chances are, in order:

3: Kansas
2: Clemson
1: Kentucky

I really don't care that clemson is rated to be in a better spot as I never thought he'd go to an in state school anyway, but to have them rated higher than Kansas is laughable. Is clemson's willingness to get a player that will only be there for 1 year going to unravel all of the work the bagmen have done? You can bet your sweet arse that if they do land the guy, football success aside, there will be an Ole Miss level investigation.

LINK
Posted by I Bleed Garnet
Cullman, AL
Member since Jul 2011
54846 posts
Posted on 9/21/17 at 9:54 am to
quote:

Is clemson's willingness to get a player that will only be there for 1 year going to unravel all of the work the bagmen have done?


I honestly don't think in this day and age in the big 2 major college sports any teams will ever be really hit that hard over bagmen.

Look at the teams like USC and Miami.
Not that bad, they seem to be going along just fine.

The NCAA isn't going to crush their cash cows like that.
And even though Clemson isn't a cash cow in basketball, they're still in the acc.

The only way the NCAA will get truly involved is child abuse/sexual abuse etc. And even that they'll then come back and rescind punishments.

At the end of the day when all this comes out for Ole Miss, Clemson, Alabama who ever.

The NCAA will strap them with scholly reductions, maybe a one year post season ban for a basketball team that isn't even close to making it, and some kind of probation.

Then they'll "investigate" extra hard, come down on baseball, softball and women's basketball, and say they did a good job.
This post was edited on 9/21/17 at 9:58 am
Posted by GameCocky88
Mount Pleasant, SC
Member since Dec 2015
4837 posts
Posted on 9/21/17 at 10:00 am to
quote:

Look at the teams like USC and Miami.


They're fine now. They were absolute dog shite for quite a while because of it. UNC? yeah they are a horse of a different color nearing untouchable. a handful of years of football success won't mask this namely because the teams that Clemson would beat to get this kid, UK, UNC, UCLA, Kansas, will cause a stink and they are much bigger fish in this fight.
Posted by I Bleed Garnet
Cullman, AL
Member since Jul 2011
54846 posts
Posted on 9/21/17 at 10:28 am to
quote:

They were absolute dog shite for quite a while because of it.


Were they? BY USC standards... prob.

But Carroll left them (with a pretty good team too)

Lane's next 3 years 8-5, 10-2, 7-6 (lane left middle of a 3-2 year)
Gone.

Then their next 4 years were 10-4 (the 3-2 year), 9-4, 8-6 (played in the pac 12 title), 10-3 (Rose Bowl)



Miami, never seemed to miss a beat with talent, just had shite coaches.
This post was edited on 9/21/17 at 11:13 am
Posted by GameCocky88
Mount Pleasant, SC
Member since Dec 2015
4837 posts
Posted on 9/21/17 at 10:36 am to
USC had good records for sure. But comparatively, other than Lane's second year, they didn't finish higher than 4th-5th in their conference until last year.
Posted by ConwayGamecock
South Carolina
Member since Jan 2012
9121 posts
Posted on 9/21/17 at 10:54 am to
quote:

They're fine now. They were absolute dog shite for quite a while because of it. UNC? yeah they are a horse of a different color nearing untouchable. a handful of years of football success won't mask this namely because the teams that Clemson would beat to get this kid, UK, UNC, UCLA, Kansas, will cause a stink and they are much bigger fish in this fight.


Yeah I agree: Clemson is an ACC school, but in terms of MBB what does this mean? Clemson's MBB program is shite, and they have little to zero impact on the $$ that the NCAA makes off of MBB. And they being put on NCAA sanctions would have little to zero impact on the MBB success of the ACC, because they never factor into that to begin with.

Meanwhile, UK, UNC, UCLA, Kansas are some of the traditional bluebloods of the sport, and if they choose to raise any ruckus over this, then the NCAA will certainly listen.

But like others I seriously doubt Williamson is going to stay in-state as it is. In any case, USC or CU are rebuilding programs - USC is further along than CU is - and if Williamson is going to be a one-and-done type of player, then his camp wants the best opportunity for him to get ample playing time - if not outright starting time - on a national program that's already a top program, and thus will get LOTS of media attention and win LOTS of games and be in the discussion for a late NCAAT run. And then actually make that late into the NCAAT run, to further push Williamson into the media limelight and highlight his abilities for the next level.

They will look for the best opportunity for him to market himself for a high NBA draft round, and what we need and especially what Clemson needs are players that will stay for a bit, develop as players and help lift the program. Both Coach Martin and Brownell for CU are not the type of coaches who prep players for early entrance into the NBA - they need time to develop players for their systems...
This post was edited on 9/21/17 at 11:01 am
Posted by I Bleed Garnet
Cullman, AL
Member since Jul 2011
54846 posts
Posted on 9/21/17 at 11:03 am to
Here's why I wouldn't rule out CLemson or USC for Zion.

Ben Simmons went to LSU
Fultz to Washington.

When you're one star around a lot of mediocre to subpar talent, makes your stock look even better.
Posted by GameCocky88
Mount Pleasant, SC
Member since Dec 2015
4837 posts
Posted on 9/21/17 at 11:27 am to
quote:

Ben Simmons went to LSU


Didn't Shaq admit on national TV that he was bought and paid for at this school. That didn't surprise me at all. I can't imagine that Fultz got paid nothing to go to Washington either.

Also, both of these guys were the first 2 ever to play college ball for a team that didn't make the tournament and get picked #1 overall.
Posted by I Bleed Garnet
Cullman, AL
Member since Jul 2011
54846 posts
Posted on 9/21/17 at 11:45 am to
quote:

Didn't Shaq admit on national TV that he was bought and paid for at this school. That didn't surprise me at all. I can't imagine that Fultz got paid nothing to go to Washington either.


So you're saying....




quote:

Also, both of these guys were the first 2 ever to play college ball


Seems to be a common trend lately.
Posted by ConwayGamecock
South Carolina
Member since Jan 2012
9121 posts
Posted on 9/21/17 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

Here's why I wouldn't rule out CLemson or USC for Zion.

Ben Simmons went to LSU
Fultz to Washington.

When you're one star around a lot of mediocre to subpar talent, makes your stock look even better.




Except for the fact that being the only star around a lot of mediocre talent and less-than mediocre coaching, Simmons didn't play in the postseason with LSU, and it was argued by many that his experience at LSU HURT - not helped - his draft status. Simmons has later been interviewed stating that his time at LSU was a waste of time for him. IMO Simmons' example at LSU would not be good for Zion....
Posted by I Bleed Garnet
Cullman, AL
Member since Jul 2011
54846 posts
Posted on 9/21/17 at 3:09 pm to
How did it hurt?

he still was taken #1.

Sure there may have been "2nd guessing" but he still was taken 1st.


quote:

has later been interviewed stating that his time at LSU was a waste of time for him


I think a lot of one and dones will say that honestly.
I think it's a stupid rule. Let the kids go to the pros.
I think it actually hurts their draft status coming from HS (and after all rankings). More tape on these kids, more time for scouts to see em, and down their stock goes.

but I understand its a rule from the NBA players union
Posted by lungbuster06
Member since Dec 2014
639 posts
Posted on 9/21/17 at 8:17 pm to
quote:

I think it's a stupid rule. Let the kids go to the pros


Agree on this...either drop the rule or change it to 3 years removed from HS like football and baseball. Baseball would be the better comparison due to immediate eligibility after HS.
Posted by ConwayGamecock
South Carolina
Member since Jan 2012
9121 posts
Posted on 9/21/17 at 10:01 pm to
It wouldn't surprise me if Zion chose to go to Clemson. Apparently his step father, or uncle once removed went to Clemson, and that's all it takes. Then there are USC legacies who wouldn't touch USC with a 20-foot pole, it seems like these days.....
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
51263 posts
Posted on 9/22/17 at 7:10 am to
Plus, it seems like Frank Martin doesn't mesh well with the in-state recruits for some reason.

It could just be an incorrect perception on my part, but I feel like this program has had an issue landing in-state players, aside form PJ and Sin (even though he was at Oak Hill).
Posted by RoyalAir
Detroit
Member since Dec 2012
5882 posts
Posted on 9/22/17 at 2:21 pm to
There's only so much money to go around. Do you think Clemson boosters will waste their funds on basketball, when their investment in football is paying such dividends?

Zion is likely headed to Kentucky. Martin wants him, but Martin doesn't "need" him. This is Calipari's wheelhouse.
Posted by Mr.Sinister
South Carolina
Member since Dec 2012
4956 posts
Posted on 9/22/17 at 10:38 pm to
quote:

This is Calipari's wheelhouse.

I'm sure that's his recruiting angle as well.

"Hey I know you're a one and done, so why not try to win a championship in college and get that experience prior to going to the NBA."

Seems like an easy sale to a teenager.
Posted by mikeboss550
Member since Apr 2013
10674 posts
Posted on 9/24/17 at 2:14 pm to
Zion skipped his official to UK this weekend. TIFWIW....
Posted by ConwayGamecock
South Carolina
Member since Jan 2012
9121 posts
Posted on 9/24/17 at 2:47 pm to
Interesting.....probably is a lock to UK. I know CFB staffs can only give out so many OVs to prospects: is that the same for MBB too? Perhaps since Calipari knows he's got Zion in the bag, he's wanting to use that OV money on someone else.

Otherwise, for a prospect to "skip" an official visit that the program was picking up the dime for, unless he's simply re-scheduling it due to some situation, I would say he's either already UK's, or he's done with UK....


Actually, I now read on UK's 247 Sports site that he only postponed the OV due to a family situation, and plans to reschedule. UK is having its "Big Blue Madness" annual event Oct. 13th, and its typically a huge recruiting event for them. Expect Zion to reschedule his OV to UK for Oct. 13 - its an open weekend for him currently...
This post was edited on 9/24/17 at 2:51 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter