Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Will Nate Aluminum be wrong again?

Posted on 12/4/16 at 9:20 am
Posted by Kcoyote
Member since Jan 2012
12050 posts
Posted on 12/4/16 at 9:20 am
LINK



Ohio State has slightly better pre-eelction odds than Hillary Clinton according to his model.
Posted by PAGator
Member since Jul 2015
2339 posts
Posted on 12/4/16 at 9:21 am to
He's right this time, only because this is as easy to predict as the 2012 Election was
Posted by TideCPA
Member since Jan 2012
10342 posts
Posted on 12/4/16 at 9:22 am to
I'm now feeling less comfortable about Bama's chances to make the final four.
Posted by Bigbens42
Trussvegas
Member since Nov 2013
6348 posts
Posted on 12/4/16 at 9:31 am to
I don't get the ragging on Nate Silver. His work is predictive modeling, and all models are by definition wrong. His model showed a Trump victory was improbable, not impossible, and I don't think that is something to jump his case about.

He actually fared much better than his peers on the election. Some idjit at HuffPo even attacked him for having Trump's chances to pull it out too high.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter