Started By
Message
I'm looking into my crystal ball for Mizzou basketball in the near future
Posted on 3/10/16 at 10:06 am
Posted on 3/10/16 at 10:06 am
and I see Mizzou not making the tourney and finishing below .500 for a third straight season.
I see Kim Anderson getting fired, Mizzou fans jumping out of their seats in excitement and anticipation for which big-name coach ole Mack Rhoades will bring in to replace him, and then every Mizzou fan will be disappointed when he hires some no-name coach who is a "True Son" that we could have hired to replace Kim this year.
I see Kim Anderson getting fired, Mizzou fans jumping out of their seats in excitement and anticipation for which big-name coach ole Mack Rhoades will bring in to replace him, and then every Mizzou fan will be disappointed when he hires some no-name coach who is a "True Son" that we could have hired to replace Kim this year.
This post was edited on 3/10/16 at 10:12 am
3
Posted on 3/10/16 at 10:16 am to TigerTalker16
If the can land Dembele he can help right away. It's got to be really tough for KA to convince a kid to come here right now. Some of that is on him, but a lot of it isn't. It's kind of like Bryant last year. He really needs to land a big like that, but imagine what the other schools are telling the kid.
Posted on 3/10/16 at 10:28 am to seaniec04
Dembele, Smith, & Nikko should be able to give Mizzou 35-40 mpg.
It's possible those guys could combined make a bigger contribution than Rosburg
I similar recruiting profile is Anunoby from JC last year. He plays 12 mpg at IU, and averages 4/3/1.
It's possible those guys could combined make a bigger contribution than Rosburg
I similar recruiting profile is Anunoby from JC last year. He plays 12 mpg at IU, and averages 4/3/1.
Posted on 3/10/16 at 10:30 am to TigerTalker16
Posted on 3/10/16 at 10:47 am to TigerTalker16
errthing will be fine if we just fire Anderson and start Lock 
This post was edited on 3/10/16 at 10:54 am
Posted on 3/10/16 at 11:55 am to wubilli
quote:
Dembele, Smith, & Nikko should be able to give Mizzou 35-40 mpg.
We don't need more MPG we need more MPH!
Posted on 3/10/16 at 11:58 am to Wtodd
Center by committee. It can work
Posted on 3/10/16 at 1:19 pm to wubilli
Smith is like 175. I don't think he'll contribute for 2-3 years. Unless I'm thinking of the wrong guy
Posted on 3/10/16 at 2:14 pm to reedus23
Rivals lists him at 195
MaxPreps at 210.
I saw him play against the kid from Nixa that is playing TE in college and he wasn't pushed around.
Chase Allen is 6'7 and 220 for comparison.
I don't think he is ready for major minutes. But he could play 10-12 per game.
One thing he does is run. He sprints down the court similar to what Thomas Bryant does at IU.
MaxPreps at 210.
I saw him play against the kid from Nixa that is playing TE in college and he wasn't pushed around.
Chase Allen is 6'7 and 220 for comparison.
I don't think he is ready for major minutes. But he could play 10-12 per game.
One thing he does is run. He sprints down the court similar to what Thomas Bryant does at IU.
This post was edited on 3/10/16 at 2:58 pm
Posted on 3/10/16 at 4:48 pm to MIZ_COU
quote:
rrthing will be fine if we just fire Anderson
It won't be. The idea is to start over and begin the rebuilding process sooner rather than later. We all know how this is going to end for Anderson after next season. This is just a waste of time.
Posted on 3/10/16 at 6:22 pm to wubilli
Him and Thomas Bryant should never be spoken in the same sentence. I have never seen anything beyond his film but have talked to people that have watched him multiple times. No way he's 210. 195 is even probably a lie. Hell, I was 6' 3" according to our roster. He might be able to run but strong is not a word anyone has ever used in describing his game. Consensus is that he's barely an MVC level talent that might be able to contribute by his 3rd or 4th year. Hopefully they are all wrong.
Posted on 3/10/16 at 6:29 pm to reedus23
The only comparison is how they run. Bryant gets lots of points by just running the floor and beating the defense down the floor.
Smith did the same thing in the games that I saw from him.
Smith did the same thing in the games that I saw from him.
Posted on 3/10/16 at 6:34 pm to wubilli
Yes, he can run. I will give him that.
Posted on 3/10/16 at 6:48 pm to reedus23
quote:
Consensus is that he's barely an MVC level talent that might be able to contribute by his 3rd or 4th year.
We're those the same guys that said that Puryear was a MVC level player last year?
Next year success is really going to depend on the development of Puryear, Phillips, Walton, and Barnett.
The key to me for Smith and Nikko is to not be a liability.
Posted on 3/10/16 at 7:22 pm to wubilli
I said Puryear was an MVC level talent. I was happy to see he arguably played above that level. Having said that, he's still not all world. Yet.
Posted on 3/10/16 at 8:04 pm to reedus23
Puryear's performance is cancelled out by CVL's. He's exactly what we thought he was.
Posted on 3/10/16 at 8:26 pm to the808bass
He played a lot worse than I thought he would.
I think if he can get off to a good start next year he can be an effective bench player.
I think if he can get off to a good start next year he can be an effective bench player.
Posted on 3/10/16 at 10:52 pm to JesusQuintana
I'm quickly turning into a women's bball fan. Can't wait to see how Sophie develops in year 2, and I think they have another good recruiting class coming in.
Someone wake me up when the men start competing for an NIT bid.
Someone wake me up when the men start competing for an NIT bid.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News