Started By
Message

Weren't we listing David Cornwell at 240ish last year?

Posted on 4/3/15 at 3:13 pm
Posted by AllBamaDoesIsWin
Member since Dec 2011
26725 posts
Posted on 4/3/15 at 3:13 pm
He's listed at 221 now.

LINK

Interesting. Maybe were over listing him the whole time, maybe he lost weight. But the 20 pound difference caught my eye.
Posted by UhOhOreo
Los Angeles
Member since Jul 2014
1771 posts
Posted on 4/3/15 at 3:36 pm to
To be fair he wasn't able to workout with an injured leg and he also was sidelined after the surgery to his ankle. That being said I don't think he would have lost that much muscle from his time off so he must have slimmed down somewhat. I wouldn't mind him bulking to 230ish though.
Posted by AllBamaDoesIsWin
Member since Dec 2011
26725 posts
Posted on 4/3/15 at 3:52 pm to
He's a guy I expect to be around 230-240, honestly, with his build. The 221 surprised me.
Posted by BlackPawnMartyr
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2010
15300 posts
Posted on 4/3/15 at 4:02 pm to
That would be an awful lot of fat to lose at his age. Have to think a good bit of that is muscle.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter