Started By
Message
re: Should the SEC have two teams considered for playoff?
Posted on 10/29/14 at 4:53 pm to tigerfoot
Posted on 10/29/14 at 4:53 pm to tigerfoot
If State is undefeated, I don't think a second team from the West that they've already beaten should get in. If there is a gaggle of one loss teams in the West, and some screwy tie breaker decides who goes to Atlanta, then I don't have a problem with two, depending on how things work out in the other conferences.
0
Posted on 10/29/14 at 4:55 pm to tigerfoot
Look at the SEC in the Cotton Bowl. Maybe the Big 12 should be banned from the playoff completely.
Posted on 10/29/14 at 5:33 pm to TeLeFaWx
Where are our quarterback rankings?
Posted on 10/29/14 at 5:36 pm to RB10
So you consider an Ohio State win against Northsouthwest Roast Beef tech a more "quality" performance than a couple of close losses to top 5 ranked SEC teams?
Posted on 10/29/14 at 5:38 pm to tigerfoot
quote:
Should the SEC have two teams considered for playoff?
Yes. MSU and Auburn. If Auburn slips up then whoever is left out of Bama, UGA and LSU.
Posted on 10/29/14 at 5:39 pm to tigerfoot
quote:Wasn't UGA loss to WV in the 2005 season? For 2006, you should consider LSU (2 loss) destroying Notre Dame.
I was looking at the Sugar Bowl over the last 8 years and it seems that the basic 'runner up' of the SEC hasn't faired too well. Just a small sample, but could support their argument if they want to make it.
2006 2 loss Georgia beat by WV
2009 1 loss Bama beat by UTAH
2011 2 loss Arky beat by OSU
2013 1 loss UF beat by Louisville
2014 1 loss Bama beat by OU
So maybe the committee should not consider a second SEC team?
Like someone else stated, 2011 Arkansas was 3rd place in West; hell 2011 UGA might be ahead of them too.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News