Started By
Message
re: 2003 LSU Vs. Arkansas - a review
Posted on 11/15/11 at 3:24 pm to NWLATigerFan12
Posted on 11/15/11 at 3:24 pm to NWLATigerFan12
quote:
Actually, it was 9 years ago...
2011-2012
2010-2011
2009-2010
2008-2009
2007-2008
2006-2007
2005-2006
2004-2005
2003-2004
bet you feel like a dumbass...
:lol:
You forgot the sarcasm flag!
Do they teach this in Louisiana public schools?
So when we played you in 2004, the game in 2003 was 2 years prior?
2004-2003 = 1 year
therefore
2011-2003 = 8 years
amazing subtraction works!
If you are reading this and you have to think about it, you are not as smart as you think you are.
To subtract 3 from 11, you might have to take off your white rubber boots.
This post was edited on 11/15/11 at 3:27 pm
Posted on 11/15/11 at 3:25 pm to relentlsspursuit
quote:
That's not what I did.
I simply restated what happened in 2003 and said this year the result will be the same.
It is possible to review history for similar situations in order to make a comparison without claiming that because something happened previously it will happen again.
This is what you are attempting to do:
2003
A, B, and C happened with X results
2011
D, E, and F happened and I predict with X results
That is a CLAIM. You are CLAIMING that "X" will happen because of D, E, and F (which aren't even similar to A, B, and C, hence why this thread is even exponentially more retarded).
You can't "review history for similar situations" because the second part of your unfounded claim hasn't even occurred yet. And even if we do lose, it has no correlation to some arbitrary pattern you've concocted in your head, which is your attempted purpose of this ridiculous thread whether you want to admit it or not.
I don't even know why I'm arguing this.
Posted on 11/15/11 at 3:30 pm to relentlsspursuit
quote:
Come down to Louisiana and get a real education!
quote:
The 2003 game has nothing to do with this game...but neither does last year's game. I think the result will be similar to 2003 but that result has nothing to do with the 2003 game.
Posted on 11/15/11 at 3:33 pm to bpfergu
Well this would be an argument better suited for the Poli Board and we're probably best off avoiding that board, I've posted there off and on for years til I finally got sick of it.
So we can just disagree and it's all good.
With all that said, I obviously think LSU will win but anything is possible on any given Saturday.
There's just an awful lot of smack talk from Arkansas fans who generally seem to reference years past as reasons the game will be close/Arkansas will win/Arkansas will blow us out (take your pick).
I don't think Arkansas is as good as advertised. Not saying they're bad but I don't think they're as good as everyone says either. Everyone talks about their high-octane offense which has barely outscored LSU's, even though LSU has faced superior opposition. LSU has allowed less than half the points that Arkansas has and scored only slightly fewer. The offenses are equally potent but LSU's defense has a drastic edge. Defense normally trumps offense.
LSU 38
Arky 21
So we can just disagree and it's all good.
With all that said, I obviously think LSU will win but anything is possible on any given Saturday.
There's just an awful lot of smack talk from Arkansas fans who generally seem to reference years past as reasons the game will be close/Arkansas will win/Arkansas will blow us out (take your pick).
I don't think Arkansas is as good as advertised. Not saying they're bad but I don't think they're as good as everyone says either. Everyone talks about their high-octane offense which has barely outscored LSU's, even though LSU has faced superior opposition. LSU has allowed less than half the points that Arkansas has and scored only slightly fewer. The offenses are equally potent but LSU's defense has a drastic edge. Defense normally trumps offense.
LSU 38
Arky 21
Posted on 11/15/11 at 3:36 pm to LOCO5150
quote:
The 2003 game has nothing to do with this game...but neither does last year's game. I think the result will be similar to 2003 but that result has nothing to do with the 2003 game.
Can you really not comprehend these sentences?
2003 has nothing to do with the result in 2011
2010 has nothing to do with the result in 2011
The result in 2011 will look similar to the result in 2003.
The result in 2011 will not be because of the result in 2003.
This post was edited on 11/15/11 at 3:36 pm
Posted on 11/15/11 at 3:37 pm to Marty McFrat
quote:
Two, that was 9 years ago.
Y U NO CAN COUNT?!?!?
2011-2003=8
Posted on 11/15/11 at 3:38 pm to Marty McFrat
delete please
This post was edited on 11/15/11 at 3:39 pm
Posted on 11/15/11 at 3:39 pm to relentlsspursuit
quote:
I thought it necessary to revist 2003.
You sound like a Bama fan.
This post was edited on 11/15/11 at 3:40 pm
Posted on 11/15/11 at 3:50 pm to relentlsspursuit
OP convinced me. Arkansas has no shot against LSU.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News