re: Georgia’s moral superiority

quote:

---

I probably don’t notice because of biases. Which is why i didn’t say no to your first question and said maybe instead. I can’t point things out I don’t notice.

---

Understood. However, when it is pointed out by several people from several fan bases, maybe there is some fire with that smoke? perhaps a closer less biased look would be in order.

quote:

---

No it does not. You’re wildly misunderstanding the definition.

---

I absolutely am not. You are.

quote:

---

Thinking you’re morally superior to someone that your not? No not a good thing.

---

Then you admit that Auburn fans are guilty of the same thing? because we have plenty of threads where Auburn fans called for Georgia fans to be shot with rubber bullets and a couple saying they should be shot with real bullets because they stormed a field.

quote:

---

I only said it that way as in that’s the definition you pulled. You could pull many different definitions from different dictionaries. I wasn’t questioning the definition.

---

Okay.

So you made a moral judgement about Georgia fans based upon your own moral superiority. Using your logic, this thread is criticizing us for us thinking we are morally superior to Auburn. In making that judgement that places you in a morally superior position over other fans.

"We are morally superior to Georgia because Georgia considers themselves to be morally superior to Auburn!
And we don't think we are morally superior!"

The irony of claiming someone else thinks they are morally superior and that is wrong is astounding. It inherently says that you are morally superior because you don't think of yourself that way when in fact the very act of bringing it up shows you do think you are morally superior.