Started By
Message

re: Facts about Texas “destroying” two conferences.

Posted on 7/29/21 at 1:08 pm to
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34346 posts
Posted on 7/29/21 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

A&M, Nebraska, Texas and OU all voted "NO" to a conference network because they all thought they could do better having their own networks.


False. They voted no because it was a risky idea at the time, as the B1G Network hadn't proven the model yet. Also the PAC shows us that just having a conference network doesn't guarantee its success without a good media partner.

quote:

Texas decides to act on that vote and everyone gets their panties in a wad because Texas was actually the first to get their own network.


No one had a problem with Texas getting a Tier 3 network, everyone in the Big 12 knew that was coming when yall carved out the inventory for such networks.

The problem was when the LHN actually launched and ESPN greatly overpaid because Texas promised all kinds of shite BEYOND what the Big 12 allowed for such networks such as high school games and more than a single football like agreed. It was very obvious after the LHN Contract got into the open that Texas was planning to ask forgiveness rather than permission in dealing with the Big 12 when it came to the LHN and so A&M said frick that.
Posted by Wolfhound45
Hanging with Chicken in Lurkistan
Member since Nov 2009
120000 posts
Posted on 7/29/21 at 1:11 pm to
quote:

cardboardboxer
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter