Started By
Message
re: More terrible LSU news new sexual harassment allegations against Dean of Admissions.
Posted on 4/14/21 at 10:49 pm to TigerLunatik
Posted on 4/14/21 at 10:49 pm to TigerLunatik
quote:
Yes. That requires contact with the alleged victim.
No sir. The joke just has to make the listener “uncomfortable” and feel sexually intimidated really. No physical contact is required
quote:
Who would he be harrasing? The requirement is for the applicants to be attractive. At this point the man hasn't even met the woman yet. I ask again, how can he harrass someone that he hasn't met yet? Is it wrong? Of course it is and he deserves to be fired for it. But, I don't see how someone can sexually harass a person they haven't even met yet. It's more than likely that he would sexually harass them once they were accepted into whatever they were applying for, but not before.
Why require attractive? For what end? How did he judge the candidate? What was his definition of attractive? What comments did he make to or about the applicants and/or workers? Why was attractiveness a criteria for this position? To satisfy what?
The answers to those means it’s sexual harassment
quote:
I don’t think so at all. Looks more like people are lumping the two things that the OP listed into one thing and then calling it all sexual harassment.
Not really. Sexual harassment is based on how a person perceived or felt something. For example. A co-worker told me about his weekend with a girl from a bar. A female coworker overheard. Never said anything to him. She reported him to HR. He damn near lost his job. He was told he put the company at risk for a sexual harassment lawsuit. He had to do all kinds of sensitivity and sexual harassment workshops.
Sexual harassment isn’t a criminal matter; it’s civil. And as such it is broad as hell.
This post was edited on 4/14/21 at 10:55 pm
2
Posted on 4/14/21 at 10:58 pm to Ted2010
quote:
The joke just has to make the listener “uncomfortable” and feel sexually intimidated really. No physical contact is required
Again, when setting a requirement the woman in this case hasn't been made aware of anything yet. How can the woman be made uncomfortable or intimated?
quote:
Why require attractive? For what end? How did he judge the candidate? What was his definition of attractive? What comments did he make to or about the applicants and/or workers? Why was attractiveness a criteria for this position? To satisfy what?
Now your getting into the selection process which requires some sort of contact. Setting a requirement for an applicant is done before the woman ever even applies. At this point she is unaware of the attractiveness requirement. That requirement is only known to the people making the selections. It's more of a discrimination thing vs a harassment thing.
quote:
A co-worker told me about his weekend with a girl from a bar. A female coworker overheard. Never said anything to him. She reported him to HR.
But, at some point the two people met each other. In the case we are discussing the two people have never seen each other or spoken to each other.
Posted on 4/16/21 at 10:42 am to Ted2010
But did any of it really happen?
And when? Why does the media refuse to say when any of this happened?
LSU-Shreveport has stated they don't think any of this has any merit. Are they wrong? Or are a group of people lying their asses off?
And when? Why does the media refuse to say when any of this happened?
LSU-Shreveport has stated they don't think any of this has any merit. Are they wrong? Or are a group of people lying their asses off?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News