Started By
Message
re: More terrible LSU news new sexual harassment allegations against Dean of Admissions.
Posted on 4/14/21 at 10:27 pm to TigerLunatik
Posted on 4/14/21 at 10:27 pm to TigerLunatik
quote:
Who is he harassing by requiring applicants to be attractive? How is that harassing them?
You don’t understand the legal definition of sexual harassment. Hint: a joke can be sexual harassment. Yes, what he did fits the legal requirements of it. And the requirement of writing papers on pornography? Yikes.
I like you my friend but gotta say you missed the boat on this one bud
This post was edited on 4/14/21 at 10:29 pm
2
Posted on 4/14/21 at 10:35 pm to Ted2010
quote:
Who is he harassing by requiring applicants to be attractive? How is that harassing them?
Of of these days, he might have the misfortune to find out that sexual harassment is not what you think it is, but rather what the recipient thinks it is.
Logic doesn't necessarily enter into this equation.
Posted on 4/14/21 at 10:39 pm to Ted2010
I'm glad I just so happened to check this thread again because I'm genuinely interested in your opinion.
Yes. That requires contact with the alleged victim.
Who would he be harrasing? The requirement is for the applicants to be attractive. At this point the man hasn't even met the woman yet. I ask again, how can he harrass someone that he hasn't met yet? Is it wrong? Of course it is and he deserves to be fired for it. But, I don't see how someone can sexually harass a person they haven't even met yet. It's more than likely that he would sexually harass them once they were accepted into whatever they were applying for, but not before.
Yeah there's a reason that I never brought that one up. That's pretty self explanatory.
I don’t think so at all. Looks more like people are lumping the two things that the OP listed into one thing and then calling it all sexual harassment.
quote:
Hint: a joke can be sexual harassment.
Yes. That requires contact with the alleged victim.
quote:
Yes, what he did fits the legal requirements of it.
Who would he be harrasing? The requirement is for the applicants to be attractive. At this point the man hasn't even met the woman yet. I ask again, how can he harrass someone that he hasn't met yet? Is it wrong? Of course it is and he deserves to be fired for it. But, I don't see how someone can sexually harass a person they haven't even met yet. It's more than likely that he would sexually harass them once they were accepted into whatever they were applying for, but not before.
quote:
And the requirement of writing papers on pornography? Yikes.
Yeah there's a reason that I never brought that one up. That's pretty self explanatory.
quote:
you missed the boat on this one bud
I don’t think so at all. Looks more like people are lumping the two things that the OP listed into one thing and then calling it all sexual harassment.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News