re: Rutgers!

A trip to the final four vs 5 one and done tourney trips absolutely sits better with me. Tells me they're getting in because of the politics of deciding who gets in, vs their actual ability. Which further emboldens me to say SC has had more than one deserving team, based on ability, that were snubbed due to politics. I'll then finish with the conclusion that much of clem's athletic success comes from their political savvy, rather than the magic of keeping it all in the family as they like to suggest. I think that conclusion also goes a long way in explaining how a power 5 school of major national prominence can't afford a track and field team like other state powerhouses Winthrop, Lander and Benedict.