Started By
Message
re: 66% of the FBS Schedule
Posted on 1/12/21 at 5:07 pm to im4LSU
Posted on 1/12/21 at 5:07 pm to im4LSU
You seem really upset. So much so that you can't accept the logical point of view the above poster provided bringing up the absence of FCS/cupcake games.
'Bama beat the #2, 4, 5, 7th and 13th ranked teams in the country.
'Bama dealt with the same issues as every other team this year.
'Bama dominated. End of story.
That's great you see the Tide's title as legitimate, but to say the season they played was watered down or matters less than those previous just doesn't stack up as a valid argument.
'Bama beat the #2, 4, 5, 7th and 13th ranked teams in the country.
'Bama dealt with the same issues as every other team this year.
'Bama dominated. End of story.
That's great you see the Tide's title as legitimate, but to say the season they played was watered down or matters less than those previous just doesn't stack up as a valid argument.
This post was edited on 1/12/21 at 5:08 pm
1
Posted on 1/12/21 at 5:43 pm to Marktastic86
Not upset at all and I fully understand the math of the schedule. My point is that y'all want tout these "all SEC schedule" and "no other team has ever won 11 SEC games" lines. That chance was afforded because of the circumstances of this year. No other SEC team has had the chance. But the minute someone points out how that "all SEC schedule" doesn't look as good as it normally may in a normal year, y'all want to jump to using the rules of other normal seasons and say "well if they had the 3 cupcake games the records wouldn't be so bad" while at the same time using your 11 win line. You want to use the rules for previous seasons to validate your opponents schedules, and use this year's rules for bama. You can't have it both ways.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News