quote:

This the part where you leave out that over half of those were .500 or below? And that your second best win of those had 4 loses and lost to the worst LSU team in 25 years...at home?

But by all means, keep pimping it

Mizzou 5-5
OM 4-5
UT 3-7
MSST 3-7
UK 4-6
LSU 5-5
Ark 3-7

MURDERERS frickING ROW

Nb4 "add 3 cupcakes and the records will be better"

Sure let's literally make shite up that didn't happen, because that's how you prove points

You just look like you are too dumb to understand basic math and that by default, conference records even out to .500 EVERY year. It's the OOC games against G5 and FCS teams that raise teams records.

Here's what those records likely would have been by removing 2 SEC losses and adding 3 G5/FCS wins(I'll leave the P5 opponent that the SEC usually wins out).

Mizzou 8-3
OM 7-3
UT 6-5
MSST 6-5
UK 7-4
LSU 8-3
Ark 6-5

Which btw is about what was expected for many of these teams.

Overall the SEC was up this year, as the bowl record showed. LSU took a seat back, but look at what their record would have been if you add the cupcakes. P5 win and it's 9-3 which is about what LSU fans expected.

This post was edited on 1/12/21 at 4:48 pm

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by im4LSU

Hattiesburg, MS

Member since Aug 2004

32183 posts

Posted on 1/12/21 at 4:58 pm to 3down10

quote:
It's the OOC games against G5 and FCS teams that raise teams records.

Maybe, maybe not. You don't know because the games didn't happen.

quote:
Here's what those records likely would have been by removing 2 SEC losses and adding 3 G5/FCS wins(I'll leave the P5 opponent that the SEC usually wins out)

Translated: "Here's what happens when I LITERALLY make up shite to try and make my team look better.

How do y'all not understand that the lengths you are going to in order to compare this year to a normal, non COMPLETELY frickED year, are literally just proving the point that this was a bullshite season??

Do not confuse that with me discrediting bama as the best this year because my God, no one was fricking close to them and their title is good in my eyes this year. It's when you have to literally "remove 2 SEC losses and add 3 G5/FCS wins" in order to try to remotely compare 2 years, that's the problem. You are making shite up to try and rationalize your point.

It's not working

1 ...

Report Post

SEC Rant - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board