Started By
Message

re: Myth: "The BCS/CFP ruined college football by making all other bowl games irrelevant."

Posted on 1/4/21 at 9:06 pm to
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
33057 posts
Posted on 1/4/21 at 9:06 pm to
quote:

my eye, all that has happened is that the CFP games are elevated much higher, but not at the expense of the others. If there is anything driving lower bowl apathy, it's the sheer volume of games with barely qualifying teams, along with the opt-outs, and a general fragmenting of entertainment. What am I missing?


Opt outs are caused by the playoff games being elevated at the expense of others.
Posted by AUstar
Member since Dec 2012
17059 posts
Posted on 1/4/21 at 9:17 pm to
quote:

Opt outs are caused by the playoff games being elevated at the expense of others.



I don't buy it. Even back in the AP era (before the BCS when NC was voted on by media), only a few teams going into bowl season had a chance at the MNC. You still didn't see teams ranked, say 20th, opting out of bowl games even though their chances of winning the MNC were zero.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter