Started By
Message
re: Rule Changes you want to see
Posted on 12/27/20 at 7:46 pm to War Eagle 777
Posted on 12/27/20 at 7:46 pm to War Eagle 777
Fumbling the ball out of the end zone giving the ball to the other team.
Stupid rule.
Any other fumble out of bounds the offense retains possession.
In case of the end zone, the defense has done nothing to deserve to earn a turnover.
Stupid rule.
Any other fumble out of bounds the offense retains possession.
In case of the end zone, the defense has done nothing to deserve to earn a turnover.
7
Posted on 12/27/20 at 7:47 pm to East Coast Band
quote:
Fumbling the ball out of the end zone giving the ball to the other team.
Nailed it. That is by far the stupidest rule in football
Posted on 12/27/20 at 7:51 pm to East Coast Band
quote:
Fumbling the ball out of the end zone giving the ball to the other team.
That's a great rule
Posted on 12/27/20 at 7:52 pm to East Coast Band
quote:The reason for that is you have to have a limit to how many yards you can lose and a penalty for for the loss of yardage. . .
Fumbling the ball out of the end zone giving the ball to the other team.
Stupid rule.
Any other fumble out of bounds the offense retains possession.
In case of the end zone, the defense has done nothing to deserve to earn a turnover
EDIT: I misunderstood. What's the fix?
quote:Cosign completely. No one-time, unintentional action should ever cause ejection and suspension.
I will start it off - change targeting so that disqualification only occurs on second call in same game against a player. Since targeting does not have to be intentional, disqualification is too stiff a penalty on first call
My change:
If an injury stops play the injured player can not re-enter the game until the ball changes possession.
This post was edited on 12/27/20 at 8:03 pm
Posted on 12/27/20 at 8:05 pm to East Coast Band
quote:
Fumbling the ball out of the end zone giving the ball to the other team. Stupid rule. Any other fumble out of bounds the offense retains possession. In case of the end zone, the defense has done nothing to deserve to earn a turnover.
So what happens when on 3rd and goal from the 8 the running back gets stuffed and “fumbles” the ball through the back of the end zone?
Posted on 12/28/20 at 12:11 am to East Coast Band
quote:
In case of the end zone, the defense has done nothing to deserve to earn a turnover.
Maybe the offense shouldn’t fumble the ball? Where do you spot it in that case? In this case, where would Saban want the bowl spotted:
Posted on 12/28/20 at 10:28 pm to East Coast Band
quote:
In case of the end zone, the defense has done nothing to deserve to earn a turnover.
The team that fumbled damn sure doesn't deserve to keep it, so what's the solution?
This post was edited on 12/28/20 at 10:30 pm
Posted on 12/29/20 at 7:41 am to East Coast Band
It isn't targeting when an offensive player ducks his head at the last second.
Ineligible man downfield should be 1 yard instead of 3.
Add an additional layer of pass interference where it is only automatic first down if the defensive player grabs/trips an offensive player who is running by him for a touchdown.
Ineligible man downfield should be 1 yard instead of 3.
Add an additional layer of pass interference where it is only automatic first down if the defensive player grabs/trips an offensive player who is running by him for a touchdown.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News