Started By
Message
re: Lack of Defense in the SEC
Posted on 11/15/20 at 10:17 am to The Sultan of Swine
Posted on 11/15/20 at 10:17 am to The Sultan of Swine
quote:
It's weird to say that after allowing 60+ but for the most part we had pretty good coverage, Trask was just putting the ball in the perfect spot and the receivers made every play they had a chance to make
Don't know about although your corners weren't too bad, the LB's and safeties were getting torched and that was with 7 and sometimes 8 guys in coverage.For some reason , Kirby and Odom didn't want to pressure Franks and it didn't exactly pay off...we did put a little more pressure on em in the 2nd half too little to late though.
1
Posted on 11/15/20 at 10:57 am to RD Dawg
quote:
Don't know about although your corners weren't too bad, the LB's and safeties were getting torched and that was with 7 and sometimes 8 guys in coverage.
LBs could've gotten deeper in their zones a couple times but I don't think torched is the right way to characterize it. Trask was finding the holes and putting the right amount of height on passes to get in between zones.
The safeties getting beat (really Foucha, specifically) had more to do with Trask having enough time to manipulate zones and find the right guy. Catalon played well I thought. Had a really good pass breakup in the endzone, and an INT. He did have a TD thrown on him in man coverage but he was in good position and I believe the UF receiver got away with a push off.
Another TD thrown on Catalon was zone I believe where he recovered well and without a really good throw it probably ends up being an incompletion
This post was edited on 11/15/20 at 11:01 am
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News