Started By
Message

re: LSU favored by 16 1/2? Why?

Posted on 9/21/20 at 5:35 pm to
Posted by Quicksilver
Poker Room
Member since Jan 2013
10746 posts
Posted on 9/21/20 at 5:35 pm to
State is young in a lot of places and historically Leach takes a couple of years to get going. State is pretty weak at WR as well, and a starting OL, DT, and CB all transferred out in the offseason. LSU's players are more talented.

That said, I think it's the most likely upset in week 1 and 16 1/2 is way too much.
Posted by civiltiger07
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2011
14036 posts
Posted on 9/21/20 at 5:54 pm to
Your brain:

quote:

State is young in a lot of places and historically Leach takes a couple of years to get going. State is pretty weak at WR as well, and a starting OL, DT, and CB all transferred out in the offseason. LSU's players are more talented.


Your Heart:

quote:

That said, I think it's the most likely upset in week 1 and 16 1/2 is way too much.

Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
53502 posts
Posted on 9/21/20 at 8:10 pm to
quote:

State is young in a lot of places


Not where it matters:

Vet QB
Top RB in the SEC returning
Experienced WRs.

Experienced DL..
Experienced LBs

quote:

historically Leach takes a couple of years to get going.


Stupid statement. You can not compare a WSU prior to Leach to a MSU prior to Leach. Nowhere near the same.

Pretty sure Leach did not have five 4* wrs, Two 4* rbs(1 being the top SEC Rusher), a QB that was .5 from a 5th star....etc



This post was edited on 9/21/20 at 8:15 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter