That is a good thing and the way it is supposed to be done. Only the sick should be tested. Asymptomatic aren't spreaders.

You should ask your dad how he feels about it instead of deciding for him. There are 100year olds out there surviving covid with no issues.

This post was edited on 8/20/20 at 3:22 pm

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by MIZ_COU

I'm right here

Member since Oct 2013

13771 posts

Posted on 8/20/20 at 10:04 pm to notsince98

I like the SEC's moxie but it's only going to take one breakout to shut football down and that's inevitable. It's only going to take one break out on campus to shut it down and it sounds like that is already happening.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by reedus23

St. Louis

Member since Sep 2011

25485 posts

Posted on 8/21/20 at 3:31 pm to notsince98

quote:
That is a good thing and the way it is supposed to be done.

Disagree. Dumbfricks shouldn't be running the shitshow. I also disagree wholeheartedly about only testing if symptomatic. The only reason to say that is if you are trying to move the numbers one way or another, which is a political reason. I don't give a frick about the politics of it. If I want to get tested, I should be able to be tested. Just like I can run down to Walgreens and get tested for strep.

Asymptomatic aren't spreaders...forgive but unless you provide your curriculum vitae, I'm gonna hold off on believing that 100%. In fact, you're literally the only person I have ever heard state this and it sounds like something that would come from a nutjob QAnon thread. Of course, I'm open to the possibility that I'm wrong bout that. Spreaders that is. I'm right about QAnon are nutjobs.

quote:
You should ask your dad how he feels about it instead of deciding for him.

It's my father in law and he lives with me. You don't think we haven't talked about it? Suffice it to say, he's not as ambivalent about dying as you are.

As for my dad...he thinks I'm being irresponsible for not having him tested if for no other reason than peace of mind.