Started By
Message

re: CFP next year final four

Posted on 2/11/20 at 7:40 am to
Posted by GeauxTigers247
Member since Oct 2019
1563 posts
Posted on 2/11/20 at 7:40 am to
quote:

Go back and read the posts. The flaws were pointed out and you had a tantrum of worthless sarcasm in response.


Are your feelings hurt? Do you want an apology? I’m not sure what we’re talking about anymore. I’ve lost interest.
Posted by cyclingout
God's country, SC
Member since Apr 2019
2238 posts
Posted on 2/11/20 at 7:52 am to
The usual. Clemson, Bama, Ohio State, and either Oklahoma/Oregon/or the SEC runner up
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
33054 posts
Posted on 2/11/20 at 7:52 am to
Make dumb points, and then lose interest in defending them?

You are the one who appeared to have hurt feelings, so that’s a silly line of questioning.
Posted by boXerrumble
Member since Sep 2011
52283 posts
Posted on 2/11/20 at 7:53 am to
quote:

UF is back but everyone else sees it.


Lol, UF isn't back until it wins a SEC title.
This post was edited on 2/11/20 at 7:53 am
Posted by Belue2Scott
Iowa (via Norcross)
Member since May 2019
1538 posts
Posted on 2/11/20 at 7:54 am to
Clemson and Ohio State are locks. Lots of talent and no serious challengers in conference.

Alabama/LSU/Georgia... whoever wins the SEC is a lock.

SEC Runner up is a lock.

The Pac Ten is trash and Oklahoma gets penalized (finally) for clogging the playoff toilet one too many times.

So... Clemson, Ohio State, Alabama, Georgia
Posted by cyclingout
God's country, SC
Member since Apr 2019
2238 posts
Posted on 2/11/20 at 7:58 am to
SEC runner up is not a lock. There's only been one year they let two SEC teams in the playoffs, and Choklahoma nearly got their first win in the playoffs because of that

The Pac may be trash but the Oregon team is stock piling talent. They have some studs on the OL, they are building a nasty defense, and they always have speed for days. Don't know about QB but I know they have some really good players.

Posted by Belue2Scott
Iowa (via Norcross)
Member since May 2019
1538 posts
Posted on 2/11/20 at 8:05 am to
quote:

SEC runner up is not a lock. There's only been one year they let two SEC teams in the playoffs, and Choklahoma nearly got their first win in the playoffs because of that

The Pac may be trash but the Oregon team is stock piling talent. They have some studs on the OL, they are building a nasty defense, and they always have speed for days. Don't know about QB but I know they have some really good players.


Oregon is screwed, because in a weak Pac Ten, they'll basically have to be undefeated to get in (most likely).

They play Ohio State in week two (where I expect they get blown out). They can't afford any bad losses with their schedule.

Plus, it's Oregon, so they'll lose one game they have no business losing (Arizona State last year, Arizona the previous year, UCLA the year before that). It's what they do.
Posted by chillmonster
Atlanta, GA
Member since Dec 2018
5073 posts
Posted on 2/11/20 at 8:09 am to
1.OSU
2.Clemson
3.Georgia/Bama
4.Bama/LSU/Georgia/Oregon/OU

If Oregon or OU are undefeated #4 goes there.

SECCG = Bama v Georgia
LSU lost too much to beat Bama, but if the SEC runner up has 2 losses LSU gets the nod with 1 loss. If the runner up has only one loss they get the nod.

If the SEC champ is undefeated they are #1 and slide OSU and Clemson down 1 - unless an SEC team is #4. In that case SEC champ gets #2.
This post was edited on 2/11/20 at 8:16 am
Posted by Sasquatch Smash
Member since Nov 2007
24067 posts
Posted on 2/11/20 at 8:21 am to
quote:

1) Clemson
2) Alabama
3) Ohio State
4a) Georgia
4b Oklahoma
4c) LSU


Where is Texas? Aren't they back? I was led to believe that they were back.
Posted by Belue2Scott
Iowa (via Norcross)
Member since May 2019
1538 posts
Posted on 2/11/20 at 8:27 am to
quote:

Where is Texas? Aren't they back? I was led to believe that they were back.


Well, considering the fact that A&M is only really relevant when Texas isn't, I'd say they are back, because nobody bothers to care about A&M anymore.
Posted by GeauxTigers247
Member since Oct 2019
1563 posts
Posted on 2/11/20 at 8:34 am to
Nothing posted on an Internet forum is going to hurt my feelings.

My initial opinion was that UF has a chance to make a run at the playoff. They pulled 3 transfers that were previously 5 star recruits that have talent and a potential to make an impact. Not to mention they’ve had top 10 recruiting classes the past two years.

UGA fans say that UF transfers are unproven, injured busts and shouldn’t be assumed to have any impact on the success of UF next year. With the exception of Brenton Cox though. Because he’s from UGA.

At that point I decided to stop having a real conversation.





Posted by chillmonster
Atlanta, GA
Member since Dec 2018
5073 posts
Posted on 2/11/20 at 8:39 am to
quote:

UGA fans say that UF transfers are unproven, injured busts and shouldn’t be assumed to have any impact on the success of UF next year. With the exception of Brenton Cox though. Because he’s from UGA.

At that point I decided to stop having a real conversation.



I'm not sold on Cox, but at least he's contributed. Other guys have done squat vs mostly inferior competition.
Posted by GeauxTigers247
Member since Oct 2019
1563 posts
Posted on 2/11/20 at 9:00 am to
quote:

I'm not sold on Cox, but at least he's contributed.


Cox had 7 tackles 13 assists and 1 sack. Mild contribution.

Justin Shorter- 12 receptions 137 yards 11.4 ypc

Lorenzo Linegard- 17 attempts 132 yards 8 ypc 2 TDs

They all had modest contributions. That’s not necessarily indicative of what they will do at a different program.

Bottom line, Dan Mullen is not going to waste time brining in transfers if he doesn’t think they’ll bring any value to his team.

Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
33054 posts
Posted on 2/11/20 at 9:03 am to
quote:

that point I decided to stop having a real conversatio


Your posts were a grand display of an inability to have a mature discussion.
Posted by GeauxTigers247
Member since Oct 2019
1563 posts
Posted on 2/11/20 at 9:11 am to
quote:

Your posts were a grand display of an inability to have a mature discussion.


Your continued posts about my intentionally nonsensical posts is a grand display of you caring way too much about what I post. Get over it. Move on.
This post was edited on 2/11/20 at 9:14 am
Posted by PanhandleDawg
Navarre Beach, FL
Member since Mar 2011
5448 posts
Posted on 2/11/20 at 11:49 am to
1BIGTigerFan

quote:

So you're saying the usual suspects?


No. He is not. Your team had an Auburn 2010 type year. That does not make LSU a "usual suscpect".

Posted by GeauxTigers247
Member since Oct 2019
1563 posts
Posted on 2/11/20 at 12:40 pm to
quote:

Your team had an Auburn 2010 type year.


When’s the last time UGA had a year like that? 1980 right?

LSU has more NCs in the last 20 years than UGA has in the entire history of their program.

Posted by s2
Southdowns
Member since Sep 2016
5574 posts
Posted on 2/11/20 at 12:51 pm to
quote:

I would think everyone is tired of Oklahoma at this point and would try a Pac 12 team if they can have a champion with two losses or less.

yes of course. CFP committee will be busy working their magic to manipulate the poles.

wonder where they get their information?

Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
33054 posts
Posted on 2/11/20 at 3:17 pm to
quote:

continued posts about my intentionally nonsensical posts is a grand display of you caring way too much about what I post. Get over it. Move on.


You acting like a child doesn’t bother me as much as you think. It’s more sad than anything else. At least own your stupid points.
Posted by GeauxTigers247
Member since Oct 2019
1563 posts
Posted on 2/11/20 at 3:41 pm to
quote:

You acting like a child doesn’t bother me as much as you think. It’s more sad than anything else. At least own your stupid points.


And yet you carry on. Please cry some more.
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter