Started By
Message

re: Napier said no to a 4 year 20 million deal?

Posted on 1/6/20 at 12:50 pm to
Posted by Cdawg
TigerFred's Living Room
Member since Sep 2003
59613 posts
Posted on 1/6/20 at 12:50 pm to
quote:

It is high risk low reward.

Mullen agrees.

quote:

The amount of financial resources being utilized in the SEC for assistants is the lowest

The number I saw was the same as Mizzou for assistants. The exact same deal.

quote:

If I wasn't a head coach at a G5 then $4,000,000 would be attractive.

What world are you living in man? 800k to 4MM isn't a attractive? You know if he wins 6, he will get a bump next year.

quote:

Napier will have options.

such as?
Posted by yatesdog38
in your head rent free
Member since Sep 2013
12737 posts
Posted on 1/6/20 at 1:01 pm to
He may not have any this year, but that is poor thinking. He is thinking 3, 5, 10 years from now. Only Mullen has moved on to better things from Mississippi State, and he was a coordinator not a HC and one that was about to lose his job. It was easier to offer him less money and for him to accept.

I guess we will find out tomorrow, but if it isn't Napier it isn't because WE said no. It is because he turned us down, and he will turn us down because of the reasons I stated.
This post was edited on 1/6/20 at 1:03 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter