Started By
Message
re: Napier said no to a 4 year 20 million deal?
Posted on 1/6/20 at 12:40 pm to Cdawg
Posted on 1/6/20 at 12:40 pm to Cdawg
It is high risk low reward. The amount of financial resources being utilized in the SEC for assistants is the lowest and you have combined with a whiny fanbase, crappy compliance department, and a micromanager for a boss. Cohen has lost institutional control. I would say no to it and tell Cohen to kick rocks and pound sand. Cohen turned us into UT, but worse.
If I wasn't a head coach at a G5 then $4,000,000 would be attractive.
Napier will have options.
If I wasn't a head coach at a G5 then $4,000,000 would be attractive.
Napier will have options.
This post was edited on 1/6/20 at 12:42 pm
1
Posted on 1/6/20 at 12:50 pm to yatesdog38
quote:
It is high risk low reward.
Mullen agrees.
quote:
The amount of financial resources being utilized in the SEC for assistants is the lowest
The number I saw was the same as Mizzou for assistants. The exact same deal.
quote:
If I wasn't a head coach at a G5 then $4,000,000 would be attractive.
What world are you living in man? 800k to 4MM isn't a attractive? You know if he wins 6, he will get a bump next year.
quote:
Napier will have options.
such as?
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News