Started By
Message
re: SC STILL getting punked by SEC refs.
Posted on 11/4/19 at 8:39 am to Lonnie Utah
Posted on 11/4/19 at 8:39 am to Lonnie Utah
Didn't see the game, but on the first one that spot was pretty close certainly within a a couple of inches and it looked the like the actual first down marker (not the yellow line) was inside the 21 and I don't think it was clear at all that the runner got inside the 21 so it doesn't look like SC clearly got screwed there.
On the second one, it certainly looked like the ball passed over the pile on while the ball carrier was in bounds. Obviously it was very close and I don't think that was an egregious miss by the official on the field. I thought it should be overturned on the review, but you could argue that none of the views showed an angle that would 100% definitely show the ball went over the pile on.
Both of these are calls of inches though. The first one in particular looks like it was probably right - not a first down. The second looks probably wrong - it was a TD, but these aren't calls that show some sort of "shady" stuff going on at all.
On the second one, it certainly looked like the ball passed over the pile on while the ball carrier was in bounds. Obviously it was very close and I don't think that was an egregious miss by the official on the field. I thought it should be overturned on the review, but you could argue that none of the views showed an angle that would 100% definitely show the ball went over the pile on.
Both of these are calls of inches though. The first one in particular looks like it was probably right - not a first down. The second looks probably wrong - it was a TD, but these aren't calls that show some sort of "shady" stuff going on at all.
Posted on 11/4/19 at 8:40 am to elposter
quote:
Both of these are calls of inches though. The first one in particular looks like it was probably right - not a first down. The second looks probably wrong - it was a TD, but these aren't calls that show some sort of "shady" stuff going on at all.
I get the point, but please keep in mind that those are the only ones I could find replay's of. There was lots more that wasn't "highlight" worthy.
Posted on 11/4/19 at 10:56 am to elposter
Wasn't egregious? How about spot the fricking ball at the 1 inch line then, there is no possible way that the play resulted in a stop AT THE 1 YARD LINE!
Gamecocks, we feel your pain, everyone on this site is kidding themselves if they think that those calls would have been the same if it was fricking Alabama.
Gamecocks, we feel your pain, everyone on this site is kidding themselves if they think that those calls would have been the same if it was fricking Alabama.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News