Started By
Message
re: When Trask has his first turnover...
Posted on 9/16/19 at 6:44 pm to StrawsDrawnAtRandom
Posted on 9/16/19 at 6:44 pm to StrawsDrawnAtRandom
quote:
It's hilarious how almost all of you think that it's the exact same thing. It explains why a lot of you were so supportive of Franks, to be quite honest.
Dude Trask is taking over the starting job a week after Franks . What did Franks have that Trask will not have to work with?
We trusted Mullen and felt like Franks was the best option at QB. Deep down even you know that Franks is better then Trask , that’s why you are making excuses for Trask already .
Posted on 9/16/19 at 6:49 pm to tjv305
quote:
Deep down even you know that Franks is better then Trask
Nah, not even close.
I think Trask is twice as good a passer as Franks for now. I haven't seen enough yet to definitively say he is, but everything I have said for the past two years checks out.
You should go read my passing breakdown during the spring game a few years ago and watch how about everything I said was right.
quote:
that’s why you are making excuses for Trask already .
He could be a bad Quarterback. I'm just trying to stop the endless amount of retardation that this forum is likely going to have for Trask's inevitable first turnover.
You guys see two Quarterbacks having a single bad game and automatically say: SEE, LAWRENCE ISN'T THAT GREAT.
TUA DIDN'T HAVE GREAT NUMBERS THIS WEEK. #EVERYQB.
Just like with Franks: Trask has to prove it to me that he's a good QB.
He may be just a serviceable QB, but that's all we've ever needed. Someone who doesn't turn the ball over, understands the game and can make accurate passes.
^ That is not the description of Franks.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)