Started By
Message
re: Time for realignment?
Posted on 9/2/19 at 9:27 am to Che Boludo
Posted on 9/2/19 at 9:27 am to Che Boludo
Agree. No divisions, 9 conference games. There is no other way to make it "fair."
2
Posted on 9/2/19 at 10:15 am to Tangineck
Agree. Flip Auburn and Missouri.
Go to 9 game schedule. Have two permanent cross division rivals so TSIO and IB stay in tact.
The other 5 teams are on a rotating 10 year cycle H-H every 5 years.
1-6
2-7
3-8
4-9
5-10
So you would play each team every five years and over a 10 year period twice but not back to back.
The other three games would be one P5, one G5 and one cream puff for HC or two P5’s and a cream puff for HC.
Go to 9 game schedule. Have two permanent cross division rivals so TSIO and IB stay in tact.
The other 5 teams are on a rotating 10 year cycle H-H every 5 years.
1-6
2-7
3-8
4-9
5-10
So you would play each team every five years and over a 10 year period twice but not back to back.
The other three games would be one P5, one G5 and one cream puff for HC or two P5’s and a cream puff for HC.
Posted on 9/2/19 at 11:29 am to Tangineck
& no divisions require more tiebreakers due to lack of common opponents - is that fair?
Not to mention 9 games means that somebody 1/2 will have 4 H while the other half have 5 H. How do you propose that if there are "no divisions"?
Not to mention 9 games means that somebody 1/2 will have 4 H while the other half have 5 H. How do you propose that if there are "no divisions"?
This post was edited on 9/2/19 at 11:31 am
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News