Started By
Message

re: The Mizzou Bowl Ban HAS to be lifted right?

Posted on 8/23/19 at 12:33 pm to
Posted by tylerdurden24
Member since Sep 2009
46596 posts
Posted on 8/23/19 at 12:33 pm to
The tutor was an employee which is why they got a showcause. Employee status doesn’t matter so much as how the school can and does react to the situation.

Posted by MU91
Minnesota
Member since Oct 2013
107 posts
Posted on 8/23/19 at 12:42 pm to
State posters will hold to their position that she wasn't an employee, even though the facts show otherwise
Posted by Prof
Member since Jun 2013
42687 posts
Posted on 8/23/19 at 1:11 pm to
quote:

The tutor was an employee which is why they got a showcause. Employee status doesn’t matter so much as how the school can and does react to the situation.


I don't know the details there but regardless a lot of it comes down to Mizzou's players being gone so the only one left to punish was Mizzou. With State, the NCAA could take their pound of flesh from the players that cheated and for those in football it's a substantial pound. Mizzou just didn't have that and got the brunt of the punishment as an institution instead.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter